Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26403792›Full record

ReviewPediatric surgery international2015

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, management in the newborn.

Merrill McHoney

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric surgery international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Merrill McHoneyRoyal Hospital for Sick Children Edinburgh, Sciennes Road, Edinburgh, EH9 1LF, UK. merrillmchoney@nhs.net.
Royal Hospital for Sick Children · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in the newborn poses challenges to the multi-disciplinary teams involved in its management. Mortality remains significantly high, despite growing understanding and treatment options. Early intubation of antenatally diagnosed cases is crucial in preventing deterioration and persistent pulmonary hypertension. Early recognition of cases not diagnosed on antenatal scan, with appreciation of differential diagnosis, requires an index of suspicion and imaging. Increasing options and modalities are available, with only modest, if any, survival advantage. Permissive hypercapnea and minimal ventilation have made the most significant impact on survival in modern era. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), treatment of pulmonary hypertension, and ECMO are used in a somewhat stepwise manner for stabilisation. Delayed surgery has become established later in management plan. The impact of individual therapies (e.g. HFOV, iNO, ECMO) on outcome is difficult to ascertain. Little level 1 or 2 evidence exists. Randomised studies and reviews on the role of ECMO have not yet proven any long-term survival benefit. One pilot randomised study of thoracoscopic repair suggests increased acidosis; intraoperative blood gases and CO2 levels should be closely monitored. Monitoring tissue oxygenation should be considered. There is no evidence to suggest the best patch material.

Indexed as

Hernias, Diaphragmatic, CongenitalHumansInfant, NewbornCongenital diaphragmatic herniaHypercapneaHypoxiaPulmonary hypertensionSurgeryThoracoscopy

Identifiers

PMID26403792
OpenAlexW2117668325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.