ReviewJournal of anatomy2016
Gene expression profiling of the inner ear.
Review in Journal of anatomy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Omics Techniques for Understanding Cochlear Genome, Epigenome, and Transcriptome in Health and Disease.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Temporal and regulatory dynamics of the inner ear transcriptome during development in mice.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Transcriptome Analyses Provide Insights into the Auditory Function inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Genetics and the Individualized Therapy of Vestibular Disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Transcriptomic analysis of mouse cochleae suffering from gentamicin damage reveals the signalling pathways involved in hair cell regeneration.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Insights into the Biology of Hearing and Deafness Revealed by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.Cell reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification of transcriptional differences has served as an important starting point in understanding the molecular mechanisms behind biological processes and systems. The developmental biology of the inner ear, the biology of hearing and of course the pathology of deafness are all processes that warrant a molecular description if we are to improve human health. To this end, technological innovation has meant that larger scale analysis of gene transcription has been possible for a number of years now, extending our molecular analysis of genes to beyond those that are currently in vogue for a given system. In this review, some of the contributions gene profiling has made to understanding developmental, pathological and physiological processes in the inner ear are highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.