Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26403525›Full record

Observational studyBMC oral health2015

Non-operative anti-caries agents and dental caries increment among adults at high caries risk: a retrospective cohort study.

Benjamin W Chaffee, Jing Cheng, John D B Featherstone

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC oral health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Biological characteristics of a human specifically targeted antimicrobial peptide C16LL-37 against Streptococcus mutans].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin W ChaffeeCenter to Address Disparities in Children's Oral Health, UCSF School of Dentistry, 3333 California Street, Suite 495, San Francisco, CA, 94143-1361, USA. benjamin.chaffee@ucsf.edu.
Jing ChengCenter to Address Disparities in Children's Oral Health, UCSF School of Dentistry, 3333 California Street, Suite 495, San Francisco, CA, 94143-1361, USA. jing.cheng@ucsf.edu.
John D B FeatherstoneUCSF School of Dentistry, 513 Parnassus Ave, Room S630, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0430, USA. john.featherstone@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Clinical and Transtional Science InstituteKL2TR000143 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2012 to 2015
$11.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000143NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsensus guidelines support non-operative preventives for dental caries management; yet, their use in practice is far from universal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of non-operative anti-caries agents in caries prevention among high caries risk adults at a university clinic where risk-based caries management is emphasized.

methodsThis retrospective observational study drew data from the electronic patient records of non-edentulous adult patients deemed to be at high risk for dental caries during baseline oral evaluations that were completed between July 1, 2007 and December 31, 2012 at a dental university in the United States. We calculated and compared adjusted mean estimates for the number of new decayed or restored teeth (DFT increment) from baseline to the next completed oral evaluation (N = 2,724 patients with follow-up) across three categories of delivery of non-operative anti-caries agents (e.g., high-concentration fluoride toothpaste, chlorhexidine rinse, xylitol products): never, at a single appointment, or at ≥2 appointments ≥4 weeks apart. Estimates were adjusted for patient and provider characteristics, baseline dental status, losses-to-follow-up, and follow-up time.

resultsApproximately half the patients did not receive any form of non-operative anti-caries agent. Most that received anti-caries agents were given more than one type of product in combination. One-time delivery of anti-caries agents was associated with a similar DFT increment as receiving no such therapy (difference in increment: -0.04; 95% CI: -0.28, 0.21). However, repeated, spaced delivery of anti-caries agents was associated with approximately one decayed or restored tooth prevented over 18 months for every three patients treated (difference in increment: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.65, -0.08).

conclusionsThese results lend evidence that repeatedly receiving anti-caries agents can reduce tooth decay among high-risk patients engaged in regular dental care.

Indexed as

Dental Caries SusceptibilityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCariostatic AgentsChlorhexidineCohort StudiesDental CariesDMF IndexElectronic Health RecordsFemaleFluoridesFollow-Up StudiesHumansAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCariostatic AgentsChlorhexidineFluoridesMouthwashesToothpastesXylitol

Identifiers

PMID26403525
PMCPMC4581405
OpenAlexW2097069273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.