ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
Systematic noise degrades gene co-expression signals but can be corrected.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative analysis of transcriptomic data reveals a predictive gene signature for chemoradiotherapy response in rectal cancer.iScience · 2026Article
- Uncovering coordinated pathway interactions through gene co-differential expression in yeast.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Prediction of gene regulatory connections with joint single-cell foundation models and graph-based learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- CorrAdjust unveils biologically relevant transcriptomic correlations by efficiently eliminating hidden confounders.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Emerging Signatures of Hematological Malignancies from Gene Expression and Transcription Factor-Gene Regulations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Higher-order correction of persistent batch effects in correlation networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Consensus molecular environment of schizophrenia risk genes in coexpression networks shifting across age and brain regions.Science advances · 2023Article
- Addressing the mean-correlation relationship in co-expression analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Comparison of confound adjustment methods in the construction of gene co-expression networks.Genome biology · 2022Article
- SeqNet: An R Package for Generating Gene-Gene Networks and Simulating RNA-Seq Data.Journal of statistical software · 2021Article
- Cleaning thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- An approach for normalization and quality control for NanoString RNA expression data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Transcriptomics in Toxicogenomics, Part III: Data Modelling for Risk Assessment.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Division of labor in honey bees is associated with transcriptional regulatory plasticity in the brain.The Journal of experimental biology · 2019Article
- Addressing confounding artifacts in reconstruction of gene co-expression networks.Genome biology · 2019Article
- Coexpression patterns define epigenetic regulators associated with neurological dysfunction.Genome research · 2019Article
- IBI: Identification of Biomarker Genes in Individual Tumor Samples.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Reproducibility of Molecular Phenotypes after Long-Term Differentiation to Human iPSC-Derived Neurons: A Multi-Site Omics Study.Stem cell reports · 2018Article
- Transcriptomic context ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- A complex network approach reveals a pivotal substructure of genes linked to schizophrenia.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the past decade, the identification of gene co-expression has become a routine part of the analysis of high-dimensional microarray data. Gene co-expression, which is mostly detected via the Pearson correlation coefficient, has played an important role in the discovery of molecular pathways and networks. Unfortunately, the presence of systematic noise in high-dimensional microarray datasets corrupts estimates of gene co-expression. Removing systematic noise from microarray data is therefore crucial. Many cleaning approaches for microarray data exist, however these methods are aimed towards improving differential expression analysis and their performances have been primarily tested for this application. To our knowledge, the performances of these approaches have never been systematically compared in the context of gene co-expression estimation.
resultsUsing simulations we demonstrate that standard cleaning procedures, such as background correction and quantile normalization, fail to adequately remove systematic noise that affects gene co-expression and at times further degrade true gene co-expression. Instead we show that a global version of removal of unwanted variation (RUV), a data-driven approach, removes systematic noise but also allows the estimation of the true underlying gene-gene correlations. We compare the performance of all noise removal methods when applied to five large published datasets on gene expression in the human brain. RUV retrieves the highest gene co-expression values for sets of genes known to interact, but also provides the greatest consistency across all five datasets. We apply the method to prioritize epileptic encephalopathy candidate genes.
conclusionsOur work raises serious concerns about the quality of many published gene co-expression analyses. RUV provides an efficient and flexible way to remove systematic noise from high-dimensional microarray datasets when the objective is gene co-expression analysis. The RUV method as applicable in the context of gene-gene correlation estimation is available as a BioconductoR-package: RUVcorr.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.