Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26403465›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2015

Variable piperaquine exposure significantly impacts protective efficacy of monthly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the prevention of malaria in Ugandan children.

Kerstin Sundell, Prasanna Jagannathan, Liusheng Huang, Victor Bigira, James Kapisi, Mary M Kakuru, Rada Savic, Moses R Kamya, Grant Dorsey, Francesca Aweeka

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00948896 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of Monthly Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine Versus Monthly Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine Versus Daily Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole Versus No Therapy for the Prevention of Malaria), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00948896 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Monthly Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine Versus Monthly Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine Versus Daily Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole Versus No Therapy for the Prevention of Malaria

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2010 to 2014Enrolled600ConditionsMalariaArmstrimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TS, TMP/SMX), sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sickle Cell Disease Clinical Trials and Phenotypes.Journal of tropical diseases & public health · 2018
    Article
  17. Sickle Cell Disease.The New England journal of medicine · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kerstin SundellDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. sundellk@hotmail.com.
Prasanna JagannathanDepartment of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, USA. pras.jagannathan@ucsf.edu.
Liusheng HuangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, USA. liusheng.huang@ucsf.edu.
Victor BigiraInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda. vbigira@gmail.com.
James KapisiInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda. kapisij@gmail.com.
Mary M KakuruInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda. marymkakuru@gmail.com.
Rada SavicDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutics, University of California, San Francisco, USA. rada.savic@ucsf.edu.
Moses R KamyaDepartment of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda. mkamya@infocom.co.ug.
Grant DorseyDepartment of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, USA. grant.dorsey@ucsf.edu.
Francesca AweekaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, USA. fran.aweeka@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration · UGMakerere University · UGUppsala University · SE

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027763 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALLORY O JOHNSON · 1988 to 2026
$93.6M
The immunologic consequences of prenatal exposure to malariaP01HD059454 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HAVLIR, DIANE V · 2008 to 2017
$22.6M
Optimizing HIV-malaria treatment in a shifting treatment and resistance landscape in AfricaR01HD068174 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRANCESCA T. AWEEKA, SUNIL PARIKH · 2011 to 2026
$8.1M
Immunologic Consequences of Highly Effective Antimalarial ChemopreventionK23AI100949 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JAGANNATHAN, PRASANNA · 2012 to 2016
$657k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI100949NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027763NICHD NIH HHS 5R01HD068174-05NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD059454NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD059454-03NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD068174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-malarial chemoprevention with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA/PQ) is a promising tool for malaria control, but its efficacy in children may be limited by inadequate drug exposure.

methodsChildren were enrolled in a non directly-observed trial of DHA/PQ chemoprevention in a high transmission setting in Uganda. Children were randomized at 6 months of age to no chemoprevention (n = 89) or monthly DHA/PQ (n = 87) and followed through 24 months of age, with pharmacokinetic sampling performed at variable times following monthly dosing of DHA/PQ. A previously published pharmacokinetic model was used to estimate piperaquine (PQ) exposure in each child, and associations between PQ exposure and the protective efficacy (PE) of DHA/PQ were explored.

resultsThe incidence of malaria was 6.83 and 3.09 episodes per person year at risk in the no chemoprevention and DHA/PQ arms, respectively (PE 54 %, 95 % CI 39-66 %, P < 0.001). Among children randomized to DHA/PQ, 493 pharmacokinetic samples were collected. Despite nearly 100 % reported adherence to study drug administration at home, there was wide variability in PQ exposure, and children were stratified into three groups based on average PQ exposure during the intervention that was determined by model generated percentiles (low, n = 40; medium, n = 37, and high, n = 10). Gender and socioeconomic factors were not significantly associated with PQ exposure. In multivariate models, the PE of DHA/PQ was 31 % in the low PQ exposure group (95 % CI 6-49 %, P = 0.02), 67 % in the medium PQ exposure group (95 % CI 54-76 %, P < 0.001), and 97 % in the high PQ exposure group (95 % CI 89-99 %, P < 0.001).

conclusionsThe protective efficacy of DHA/PQ chemoprevention in young children was strongly associated with higher drug exposure; in children with the highest PQ exposure, monthly DHA/PQ chemoprevention was nearly 100 % protective against malaria. Strategies to ensure good adherence to monthly dosing and optimize drug exposure are critical to maximize the efficacy of this promising malaria control strategy.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials Identifier NCT00948896.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsArtemisininsChemopreventionDisease Transmission, InfectiousMalariaQuinolinesAdolescentAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMalePiperazinesRandom AllocationTreatment OutcomeAntimalarialsArtemisininsartenimolpiperaquinePiperazinesQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID26403465
PMCPMC4582734
OpenAlexW2145229108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.