Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26403248›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2016

Root morphological responses of five soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] cultivars to cadmium stress at young seedlings.

Peng Wang, Xiaojuan Deng, Yian Huang, Xiaolong Fang, Jie Zhang, Haibo Wan, Cunyi Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peng WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Breeding, Guangdong Subcenter of National Center for Soybean Improvement, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Xiaojuan DengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Breeding, Guangdong Subcenter of National Center for Soybean Improvement, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Yian HuangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Breeding, Guangdong Subcenter of National Center for Soybean Improvement, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Xiaolong FangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Breeding, Guangdong Subcenter of National Center for Soybean Improvement, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Jie ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Breeding, Guangdong Subcenter of National Center for Soybean Improvement, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Haibo WanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Breeding, Guangdong Subcenter of National Center for Soybean Improvement, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Cunyi YangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Breeding, Guangdong Subcenter of National Center for Soybean Improvement, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China. ycy@scau.edu.cn.
South China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine the differences in root morphological responses of soybean cultivars with different cadmium (Cd) tolerance and accumulation to Cd stress, the biomass, Cd concentration, and root morphological features of five soybean cultivars were determined under 0, 9, 23, 45, and 90 μM Cd stress via hydroponic experiments. Significantly genotypic differences in Cd tolerance and Cd concentration were observed between five soybean cultivars at four Cd levels. For Cd tolerance, HX3 showed a strong Cd tolerance with tolerance indexes of shoot biomass at 92.49, 76.44, 60.21, and 46.45% after 18 days at four Cd levels, and others had similar weak tolerance at young seedling. For Cd accumulation, Cd concentration in roots showed far higher than that in shoots. The different accumulation features in roots and shoots among five cultivars were found at four Cd levels. Comparing with the control, the total root length (RL), root surface area (SA), and root volume (RV) of all cultivars were decreased significantly at four Cd levels. Tolerant cultivar HX3 had the largest root system and sensitive cultivar BX10 had the smallest root system at young seedling stage. Correlation analysis indicated that RL, SA, and RV were positively correlated with root biomass and shoot biomass under 9 and 23 μM Cd treatments, but root average diameter (RD) was negatively correlated with shoot biomass and root biomass only under 9 μM Cd treatments, while RL and SA were negatively correlated with root Cd concentration under 23 and 45 μM Cd treatments. The results suggested that root morphological traits were closely related to Cd tolerance at young seedlings under Cd treatments.

Indexed as

BiomassCadmiumGlycine maxHydroponicsPlant RootsSeedlingsCadmiumAccumulationCdRoot morphologySoybeanTolerance

Identifiers

PMID26403248
OpenAlexW1734890121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.