Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26403221›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2015

Implementing evidence-based psychological treatments for cancer patients.

Kristen C Williams, Brittany M Brothers, Marlena M Ryba, Barbara L Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Replicating dissemination and identifying mechanisms of implementation of an empirically supported treatment.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predicting implementation of an empirically supported treatment for cancer patients using the theory of planned behavior.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristen C WilliamsDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Brittany M BrothersDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Marlena M RybaDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Barbara L AndersenDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

Funding

Biobehavioral intervention training for supportive care professionalsR25CA163197 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSEN, BARBARA L. · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
Biobehavioral Responses to CancerK05CA098133 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSEN, BARBARA L. · 2004 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA098133NCI NIH HHS CA163917NCI NIH HHS K05 CA098133NCI NIH HHS R25 CA163197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNew regulations and guidelines require implementation of screening and evidence based psychological treatment (EBT) for cancer patients, but little research exists to assist psychosocial care providers with implementation. This study aimed to develop a conceptual framework for community providers to consider as they embark on implementation of EBTs.

methodsFull-time psychosocial care providers received dissemination training in delivery of a cancer-specific EBT and then received implementation support. Qualitative data were collected in two phases. In Phase I, after training, trainees (N = 52) participated in six monthly group conference calls with six to eight trainees and EBT trainers. Qualitative data from the calls were analyzed using a grounded theory paradigm. In Phase II, the resultant framework was piloted with additional trainees (N = 73) during EBT training to prompt early planning for implementation at their home institutions.

resultsIn Phase I, themes of 'person' (i.e. attitudes, vocalizations, and behaviors of others) and 'environment' factors (i.e. material, monetary, and time resources of organizations) affecting implementation emerged. It appeared that both factors influenced how easily barriers could be addressed, although positive person factors also appeared to positively influence environment factors. In Phase II, trainees found the framework acceptable and considered it when generating solutions for implementation challenges.

conclusionsThe framework suggests tailoring implementation efforts to consider person and environment factors. As person support is developed, resource limitations of the environment may be more easily addressed.

Indexed as

PsychotherapyCommunity Mental Health ServicesEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsPilot ProjectsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID26403221
PMCPMC4715685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.