ArticlePsycho-oncology2015
Implementing evidence-based psychological treatments for cancer patients.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a Psychosocial Care Quality Improvement Strategy to Address Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer: The HuCare2 Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Evaluating the effectiveness and implementation of evidence-based treatment: A multisite hybrid design.The American psychologistTrial
- Oncology mental health providers' adaptation of an evidence-based intervention: A mixed-methods study.Psycho-oncology · 2024Article
- Replicating dissemination and identifying mechanisms of implementation of an empirically supported treatment.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021Article
- Achieving oncology mental health providers' usage of an empirically supported treatment: Lessons learned.Psycho-oncology · 2021Article
- Implementation of a Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy training (MCPT) program for oncology clinicians: a qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Sustainability of a biobehavioral intervention implemented by therapists and sustainment in community settings.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Development and Implementation of a Psychological Service for Patients With Cancer.Cognitive and behavioral practice · 2020Article
- Predicting implementation of an empirically supported treatment for cancer patients using the theory of planned behavior.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2019Article
- Oncology social work practice behaviors: a national survey of AOSW members.Journal of psychosocial oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNew regulations and guidelines require implementation of screening and evidence based psychological treatment (EBT) for cancer patients, but little research exists to assist psychosocial care providers with implementation. This study aimed to develop a conceptual framework for community providers to consider as they embark on implementation of EBTs.
methodsFull-time psychosocial care providers received dissemination training in delivery of a cancer-specific EBT and then received implementation support. Qualitative data were collected in two phases. In Phase I, after training, trainees (N = 52) participated in six monthly group conference calls with six to eight trainees and EBT trainers. Qualitative data from the calls were analyzed using a grounded theory paradigm. In Phase II, the resultant framework was piloted with additional trainees (N = 73) during EBT training to prompt early planning for implementation at their home institutions.
resultsIn Phase I, themes of 'person' (i.e. attitudes, vocalizations, and behaviors of others) and 'environment' factors (i.e. material, monetary, and time resources of organizations) affecting implementation emerged. It appeared that both factors influenced how easily barriers could be addressed, although positive person factors also appeared to positively influence environment factors. In Phase II, trainees found the framework acceptable and considered it when generating solutions for implementation challenges.
conclusionsThe framework suggests tailoring implementation efforts to consider person and environment factors. As person support is developed, resource limitations of the environment may be more easily addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.