Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26403082›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

A checklist to improve reporting of group-based behaviour-change interventions.

Aleksandra J Borek, Charles Abraham, Jane R Smith, Colin J Greaves, Mark Tarrant

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03228706 (Effectiveness of a Structured Group-Based Intervention "Know Your Medicine - Take It For Health"), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03228706 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Structured Group-Based Intervention "Know Your Medicine - Take It For Health" (KYM-TIFH) in Improving Medication Adherence Among Malay Patients With Underlying Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Sarawak State of Malaysia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinical Research Centre, MalaysiaRan2017 to 2019Enrolled142ConditionsMedication Adherence, Type 2 Diabetes MellitusArmsKnow Your Medicine - Take It For Health (KYM-TIFH)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The dose of behavioral interventions to prevent and treat childhood obesity: a systematic review and meta-regression.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Training Healthcare Professionals to Deliver a Group-Based Intervention for People Living With Severe Obesity: Lessons From the PROGROUP Feasibility Trial.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Rehabilitation following lumbar fusion surgery (REFS) a randomised controlled feasibility study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aleksandra J BorekPsychology Applied to Health group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. a.borek@exeter.ac.uk.
Charles AbrahamPsychology Applied to Health group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. c.abraham@exeter.ac.uk.
Jane R SmithPsychology Applied to Health group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. jane.smith@exeter.ac.uk.
Colin J GreavesPsychology Applied to Health group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. c.j.greaves@exeter.ac.uk.
Mark TarrantPsychology Applied to Health group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. m.tarrant@exeter.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2012-05-259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublished descriptions of group-based behaviour-change interventions (GB-BCIs) often omit design and delivery features specific to the group setting. This impedes the ability to compare behaviour-change interventions, synthesise evidence on their effectiveness and replicate effective interventions. The aim of this study was to develop a checklist of elements that should be described to ensure adequate reporting of GB-BCIs.

methodsA range of characteristics needed to replicate GB-BCIs were extracted from the literature and precisely defined. An abbreviated checklist and a coder manual were developed, pilot tested and refined. The final checklist and coder manual were used to identify the presence or absence of specified reporting elements in 30 published descriptions of GB-BCIs by two independent coders. Reliability of coding was assessed.

resultsThe checklist comprises 26 essential reporting elements, covering intervention design, intervention content, participant characteristics, and facilitator characteristics. Inter-rater reliability for identification of reporting elements was high (95% agreement, Mean AC1 = 0.89).

conclusionThe checklist is a practical tool that can be used, alongside other reporting guidelines, to ensure comprehensive description and to assess reporting quality of GB-BCIs. It can also be helpful for designing group-based health interventions.

Indexed as

Group StructureBehavior TherapyChecklistHumansObserver VariationProgram EvaluationReproducibility of ResultsResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID26403082
PMCPMC4583168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.