Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26403064›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Decreased bilateral thalamic gray matter volume in first-episode schizophrenia with prominent hallucinatory symptoms: A volumetric MRI study.

Peng Huang, Yibin Xi, Zhong-Lin Lu, Yunchun Chen, Xiangrui Li, Weiguo Li, Xia Zhu, Long-Biao Cui, Qingrong Tan, Wenming Liu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Ultra-high Field fMRI Reveals Effect of Ketamine on Vocal Processing in Common Marmosets.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Peng HuangDepartment of Medical Psychology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China.
Yibin XiDepartment of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China.
Zhong-Lin LuThe Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Brain Imaging (CCBBI), Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Yunchun ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China.
Xiangrui LiThe Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Brain Imaging (CCBBI), Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Weiguo LiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Xia ZhuDepartment of Medical Psychology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China.
Long-Biao CuiDepartment of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China.
Qingrong TanDepartment of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China.
Wenming LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China.
Chen LiDepartment of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China.
Danmin MiaoDepartment of Medical Psychology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China.
Hong YinDepartment of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China.
Air Force Medical University · CNXijing Hospital · CNThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies comparing gray matter (GM) volume of schizophrenic patients with or without auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) to that of normal controls remain controversial. This project aims to investigate changes of GM volumes of drug-naïve schizophrenic patients with and without AVHs. Eighteen first episode schizophrenic (FES) patients with AVHs, 18 FES patients without AVHs, and 18 healthy controls were scanned using structural MRI. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis was conducted to investigate changes of GM volume among the three groups. Patients with and without AVHs exhibited reduced GM volumes relative to normal controls in the left superior temporal gyrus, frontal regions, cerebellum and caudate. Further analysis of the GM of subcortical structures found that patients with AVHs had reduced thalamic volume than healthy controls. No significant difference was found between patients with and without AVHs. Significant correlation was found between the total scores of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and bilateral thalamic volume. ROC analysis of thalamic volumes of the patients with AVHs and normal controls showed that the area under the curve was 0.698 (P = 0.043). The decreased thalamic volumes might serve as a biomarker for discriminating FES AVHs patients from normals.

Indexed as

HallucinationsSchizophrenic PsychologyAdolescentAdultBrain MappingCase-Control StudiesFemaleGray MatterHumansHypothalamusMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOrgan SizeROC CurveSchizophreniaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26403064
PMCPMC4585923
OpenAlexW2411722458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.