Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26402905›Full record

Observational studyPLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Economic Impact of Dengue: Multicenter Study across Four Brazilian Regions.

Celina Maria Turchi Martelli, Joao Bosco Siqueira, Mirian Perpetua Palha Dias Parente, Ana Laura de Sene Amancio Zara, Consuelo Silva Oliveira, Cynthia Braga, Fabiano Geraldo Pimenta, Fanny Cortes, Juan Guillermo Lopez, Luciana Ribeiro Bahia and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic review of dengue vaccine efficacy.BMC infectious diseases · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Long-Term Durability and Public Health Impact of City-WideTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Celina Maria Turchi MartelliDepartment of Public Health, Aggeu Magalhaes Research Centre, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife, Brazil; Department of Community Health, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Brazil.
Joao Bosco SiqueiraDepartment of Community Health, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Brazil.
Mirian Perpetua Palha Dias ParenteDepartment of Community Health, Universidade Estadual do Piaui, Teresina, Brazil.
Ana Laura de Sene Amancio ZaraDepartment of Community Health, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Brazil.
Consuelo Silva OliveiraUniversidade do Estado do Para, Belem, Brazil.
Cynthia BragaDepartment of Public Health, Aggeu Magalhaes Research Centre, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife, Brazil.
Fabiano Geraldo PimentaDepartment of Health Surveillance, Secretaria Municipal Saude Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Fanny CortesDepartment of Health Science, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Juan Guillermo LopezHealth Economics and Market Access, Sanofi Pasteur Latin America, Mexico City, Mexico.
Luciana Ribeiro BahiaDepartment of Internal Medicine, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marcia Costa Ooteman MendesDepartment of Health Surveillance, Secretaria Municipal Saude Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Michelle Quarti Machado da RosaDepartment of Internal Medicine, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Noemia Teixeira de Siqueira FilhaDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Dagna ConstenlaDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Wayner Vieira de SouzaDepartment of Public Health, Aggeu Magalhaes Research Centre, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue is an increasing public health concern in Brazil. There is a need for an updated evaluation of the economic impact of dengue within the country. We undertook this multicenter study to evaluate the economic burden of dengue in Brazil.

methodsWe estimated the economic burden of dengue in Brazil for the years 2009 to 2013 and for the epidemic season of August 2012- September 2013. We conducted a multicenter cohort study across four endemic regions: Midwest, Goiania; Southeast, Belo Horizonte and Rio de Janeiro; Northeast: Teresina and Recife; and the North, Belem. Ambulatory or hospitalized cases with suspected or laboratory-confirmed dengue treated in both the private and public sectors were recruited. Interviews were scheduled for the convalescent period to ascertain characteristics of the dengue episode, date of first symptoms/signs and recovery, use of medical services, work/school absence, household spending (out-of-pocket expense) and income lost using a questionnaire developed for a previous cost study. We also extracted data from the patients' medical records for hospitalized cases. Overall costs per case and cumulative costs were calculated from the public payer and societal perspectives. National cost estimations took into account cases reported in the official notification system (SINAN) with adjustment for underreporting of cases. We applied a probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations with 90% certainty levels (CL).

resultsWe screened 2,223 cases, of which 2,035 (91.5%) symptomatic dengue cases were included in our study. The estimated cost for dengue for the epidemic season (2012-2013) in the societal perspective was US$ 468 million (90% CL: 349-590) or US$ 1,212 million (90% CL: 904-1,526) after adjusting for under-reporting. Considering the time series of dengue (2009-2013) the estimated cost of dengue varied from US$ 371 million (2009) to US$ 1,228 million (2013).

conclusionsThe economic burden associated with dengue in Brazil is substantial with large variations in reported cases and consequently costs reflecting the dynamic of dengue transmission.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAbsenteeismAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilChildChild, PreschoolDengueFemaleHealth ExpendituresHealth ServicesHumansInfantInterviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26402905
PMCPMC4581827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.