Observational studyMedicine2015
Prognostic Impact of Blood Pressure Variability on Aortic Dissection Patients After Endovascular Therapy.
Observational study in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of a non-contrast CT-based radiomics model in patients with Type-B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Correlation between systolic blood pressure variability and in-hospital mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Short-term pulse pressure variability: a novel prognostic marker and therapeutic target in patients with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome? Preliminary results from a pilot study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Prognostic Impact of Blood Pressure Change Patterns on Patients With Aortic Dissection After Admission.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Prescreening and treatment of aortic dissection through an analysis of infinite-dimension data.BioData mining · 2021Article
- Iron deficiency promotes aortic medial degeneration via destructing cytoskeleton of vascular smooth muscle cells.Clinical and translational medicine · 2021Article
- Impact of meteorological factors on the occurrence of acute aortic dissection in Fujian Province, China: a single-center seven-year retrospective study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2020Article
- Association Between Blood Pressure Variability and Short-Term Outcome After Intra-arterial Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke Patients With Large-Vessel Occlusion.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Efficacy of "Pinggan Formula" in Controlling Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Perioperative Blood Pressure: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019Article
- Relationship between serum cortisol level and degree of false lumen thrombosis in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension has been deemed as a pivotal risk factor for the development of aortic dissection; however, the importance and prognostic significance of blood pressure variability (BPV) in aortic dissection are always ignored. A total of 173 acute type B aortic dissection patients were enrolled in and retrospectively reviewed between January 2009 and November 2013. There were 74 patients with high BPV and 99 with low BPV stratified by preoperative mean BPV. Technical success was achieved in all patients. The proportions of hypertension and general anesthesia were significantly higher in the high BPV group (70.3% vs 55.6% and 77% vs 62.6%, P = 0.049 and 0.043, respectively). The risk of aorta-related death in the high BPV group was apparently higher than the low BPV group (28.4% vs 9.1%, P = 0.001). By performing multivariable logistic regression, we found history of hypertension was likely to be a risk factor of BPV (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.010-3.911), and high BPV was an independent predictor of aorta-related death (95% CI: 1.671-9.587). The difference of aorta-related mortality was pronounced between high and low BPV subgroups regardless of the refractory hypertension (41.4% vs 14.3% and 20.0% vs 7.0%, P = 0.023 and 0.037, respectively). The thrombosis ratio of false lumen was significantly higher in the low BPV group at 3-month (72.4 ± 17.5% vs 51.8 ± 11.6%, P < 0.001) and 6-month (86.4 ± 9.1% vs 69.7 ± 7.9%, P < 0.001). High BPV is an independent risk factor for the prognosis of aortic dissection. Further studies on BPV might provide new preventive and therapeutic strategies for aortic dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.