Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26402795›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

An Automated System for Skeletal Maturity Assessment by Extreme Learning Machines.

Marjan Mansourvar, Shahaboddin Shamshirband, Ram Gopal Raj, Roshan Gunalan, Iman Mazinani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marjan MansourvarFaculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Shahaboddin ShamshirbandFaculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Ram Gopal RajFaculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Roshan GunalanFaculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Iman MazinaniFaculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing skeletal age is a subjective and tedious examination process. Hence, automated assessment methods have been developed to replace manual evaluation in medical applications. In this study, a new fully automated method based on content-based image retrieval and using extreme learning machines (ELM) is designed and adapted to assess skeletal maturity. The main novelty of this approach is it overcomes the segmentation problem as suffered by existing systems. The estimation results of ELM models are compared with those of genetic programming (GP) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) models. The experimental results signify improvement in assessment accuracy over GP and ANN, while generalization capability is possible with the ELM approach. Moreover, the results are indicated that the ELM model developed can be used confidently in further work on formulating novel models of skeletal age assessment strategies. According to the experimental results, the new presented method has the capacity to learn many hundreds of times faster than traditional learning methods and it has sufficient overall performance in many aspects. It has conclusively been found that applying ELM is particularly promising as an alternative method for evaluating skeletal age.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAge Determination by SkeletonBone and BonesFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID26402795
PMCPMC4581666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.