Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26402408›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2015

Blood-brain barrier breakdown and neovascularization processes after stroke and traumatic brain injury.

Roshini Prakash, S Thomas Carmichael

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 164 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
164citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

164 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 303 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effect of angiopoietin-1 upregulation on the outcome of acute ischaemic stroke in rodent models: A meta-analysis.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

104 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roshini PrakashDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
S Thomas Carmichael
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Neuronal Regeneration after Stroke in a Novel Neurovascular NicheR01NS053957 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CARMICHAEL, STANLEY THOMAS · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
Molecular Signaling within a Regenerative Neurovascular Niche after StrokeR01NS081055 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CARMICHAEL, STANLEY THOMAS · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS053957NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAngiogenesis or vascular reorganization plays a role in recovery after stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI). In this review, we have focused on two major events that occur during stroke and TBI from a vascular perspective - what is the process and time course of blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown? and how does the surrounding vasculature recover and facilitate repair? RECENT

findingsDespite differences in the primary injury, the BBB changes overlap between stroke and TBI. Disruption of BBB involves a series of events: formation of caveolae, trans and paracellular disruption, tight junction breakdown and vascular disruption. Confounding factors that need careful assessment and standardization are the severity, duration and extent of the stroke and TBI that influences BBB disruption. Vascular repair proceeds through long-term neovascularization processes: angiogenesis, arteriogenesis and vasculogenesis. Enhancing each of these processes may impart beneficial effects in endogenous recovery. SUMMARY: Our understanding of BBB breakdown acutely after the cerebrovascular injury has come a long way; however, we lack a clear understanding of the course of BBB disruption and BBB recovery and the evolution of individual cellular events associated with BBB change. Neovascularization responses have been widely studied in stroke for their role in functional recovery but the role of vascular reorganization after TBI in recovery is much less defined.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierBrain InjuriesHumansNeovascularization, PhysiologicStroke

Identifiers

PMID26402408
PMCPMC5267616
OpenAlexW2341136898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.