Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26402350›Full record

Trial reportJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2015

Brief Motivational Interventions Are Associated With Reductions in Alcohol-Impaired Driving Among College Drinkers.

Jenni B Teeters, Brian Borsari, Matthew P Martens, James G Murphy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00247182 (Stepped Care for Mandated College Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00247182 phase1completednot on this map

Stepped Care for Mandated College Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)Ran2006 to 2011Enrolled598ConditionsAlcohol UseArmsStep 1: Minimal Intervention, Step 2: Brief Motivational Intervention, Alcohol Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Injunctive Norms and Driving Under the Influence and Riding With an Impaired Driver Among Young Adults in Washington State.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative Effectiveness of Brief Alcohol Interventions for College Students: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenni B TeetersDepartment of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
Brian BorsariMental Health and Behavioral Sciences Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island.
Matthew P MartensDepartment of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, The University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
James G MurphyDepartment of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.

Funding

Improving brief alcohol interventions with a behavioral economic supplementR01AA020829 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI MURPHY, JAMES G. · 2012 to 2016
$2.6M
Stepped Care for Mandated College StudentsR01AA015518 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BORSARI, BRIAN · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015518NIAAA NIH HHS R01-AA015518NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlcohol-impaired (AI) driving among college students remains a significant public health concern and may be the single most risky drinking outcome among young adults. Brief motivational interventions (BMIs) have been shown to reduce alcohol use and problems, but their specific efficacy for decreasing AI driving among college students is unknown. The present study analyzed data from three randomized controlled trials of BMI (Murphy et al., 2010: n = 74; Borsari et al., 2012: n = 530; and Martens et al., 2013: n = 365) to evaluate whether BMIs are associated with reductions in AI driving among college student drinkers.

methodParticipants in all three studies were randomized to BMI or control conditions. Participants reported whether they had driven under the influence (yes/no) following the BMI over the follow-up period.

resultsSeparate binary logistic regression analyses were conducted for each study. For Studies 1 and 2, these analyses revealed that a BMI was significantly associated with reductions in AI driving at the final (6-month and 9-month, respectively) follow-up compared with the control condition. For Study 3, analyses revealed that a single-component BMI focused on the correction of misperceptions of descriptive norms was significantly associated with reductions in AI driving compared with the control group at the final (6-month) followup, whereas a single-component BMI focused on the use of protective behavioral strategies was not. Change in drinking level did not mediate the relationship between the condition and the change in AI driving.

conclusionsCounselor-administered BMIs that include descriptive normative feedback are associated with significant reductions in AI driving compared with control.

Indexed as

Alcohol Drinking in CollegeAutomobile DrivingAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingFemaleHumansMaleMotivationMotivational InterviewingStudentsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26402350
PMCPMC4714822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.