Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26402167›Full record

SynthesisJAMA oncology2015

Effectiveness of an Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Takeo Fujii, Fanny Le Du, Lianchun Xiao, Takahiro Kogawa, Carlos H Barcenas, Ricardo H Alvarez, Vicente Valero, Yu Shen, Naoto T Ueno

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (DuomeisuBreast cancer research and treatment · 2023
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takeo FujiiDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston2The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston.
Fanny Le DuDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Lianchun XiaoDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Takahiro KogawaDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Carlos H BarcenasDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Ricardo H AlvarezDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Vicente ValeroDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Yu ShenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Naoto T UenoDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR BREAST CANCER SCREENING STUDIESR01CA079466 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHEN, YU · 1999 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA016672NCI NIH HHS CA079466NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA079466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceDifferent adjuvant chemotherapy regimens are available for early-stage breast cancer. Because conventional meta-analysis does not allow comparing all regimens, we performed a network meta-analysis to identify the most effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen.

objectiveTo find the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published before June 2015; the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting abstracts from January 1983 through December 2014; and the American Association for Cancer Research annual meeting abstracts from January 1916 through December 2014. Additionally, we manually searched bibliographies for related references. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized clinical trials of adjuvant treatments for early-stage breast cancer that compared 2 or more of the following: no adjuvant chemotherapy; sequential anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane (AC-T); concurrent anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane (ACT); anthracycline-cyclophosphamide without taxane (AC); docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC); cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF); and platinum-containing regimens. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We followed the PRISMA guidelines. Two investigators independently selected the articles and extracted information. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with another author. Quality was assessed by Cochrane risk-of-bias method. Data were pooled using random-effects models. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We used network meta-analysis to test the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen in terms of overall survival (OS) by comparing regimens listed in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and platinum-containing regimens.

resultsWe identified 24 trials. The TC and platinum-containing regimens had OS benefit similar to that of sequential AC-T (TC hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.62-1.40; and platinum HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31). Patients treated with CMF or AC had significantly worse OS than those treated with sequential AC-T (CMF HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.32-1.85; and AC HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.37). Platinum-containing regimens tended to be more toxic than sequential AC-T. The toxicity of TC was similar to or less than that of sequential AC-T. Meta-regression analysis showed that hormone receptor status did not impact the HRs for OS for any regimen. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Sequential AC-T is likely to be the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer regardless of hormone receptor status.

Indexed as

AnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsBridged-Ring CompoundsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinCyclophosphamideDocetaxelFemaleFluorouracilHumansPlatinum CompoundsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTaxoidsTreatment OutcomeAnthracyclinesBridged-Ring CompoundsCisplatinCyclophosphamideDocetaxelFluorouracilPlatinum CompoundstaxaneTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID26402167
PMCPMC5575939
OpenAlexW2162405246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.