Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26401752›Full record

Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016

Timing of umbilical cord clamping among infants born at 22 through 27 weeks' gestation.

C H Backes, H Huang, J D Iams, J A Bauer, P J Giannone

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Antenatal and perinatal factors influencing neonatal blood pressure: a systematic review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical aspects of incorporating cord clamping into stabilisation of preterm infants.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C H BackesThe Center for Perinatal Research, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
H HuangDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
J D IamsDepartment of Obstetrics/Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
J A BauerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
P J GiannoneDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

Indomethacin and delayed umbilical cord clamp for preterm infant IVHR01HD070792 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BAUER, JOHN ANTHONY, GIANNONE, PETER J · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD070792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of delayed cord clamping (DCC) compared with immediate cord clamping (ICC) at delivery among infants born at 22 to 27 weeks' gestation. STUDY

designThis was a pilot, randomized, controlled trial in which women in labor with singleton pregnancies at 22 to 27 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned to ICC (cord clamped at 5 to 10 s) or DCC (30 to 45 s).

resultsForty mother-infant pairs were randomized. Infants in the ICC and DCC groups had mean gestational ages (GA) of 24.6 and 24.4 weeks, respectively. No differences were observed between the groups across all available safety measures, although infants in the DCC group had higher admission temperatures than infants in the ICC group (97.4 vs. 96.2 °F, P=0.04). During the first 24 h of life, blood pressures were lower in the ICC group than in the DCC group (P<0.05), despite a threefold greater incidence of treatment for hypotension (45% vs. 12%, P<0.01). Infants in the ICC group had increased numbers of red blood transfusions (in first 28 days of life) than infants in DCC group (4.1±3.9 vs. 2.8±2.2, P=0.04).

conclusionAmong infants born at an average GA of 24 weeks', DCC appears safe, logistically feasible, and offers hematological and circulatory advantages compared with ICC. A more comprehensive appraisal of this practice is needed.

Indexed as

Blood PressureAcademic Medical CentersConstrictionErythrocyte TransfusionFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornMaleOhioPilot ProjectsTime FactorsUmbilical Cord

Identifiers

PMID26401752
PMCPMC5095613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.