ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2015
Changes of shear-wave velocity by interferon-based therapy in chronic hepatitis C.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elastography for Longitudinal Assessment of Liver Fibrosis after Antiviral Therapy: A Review.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2020Review
- Shear wave elastography in hepatitis C patients before and after antiviral therapy.World journal of hepatology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the changes of shear-wave velocity (Vs) by acoustic radiation force impulse after treatment in chronic hepatitis C.
methodsEighty-seven patients with chronic hepatitis C were consecutively treated with combinations of interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV). Vs value (m/s) was measured with acoustic radiation force impulse before treatment, at end of treatment (EOT), 1 year after EOT, and 2 years after EOT.
resultsIn patients with a sustained virological response (SVR) (n = 41), Vs significantly decreased at EOT [1.19 (1.07-1.37), P = 0.0004], 1 year after EOT [1.10 (1.00-1.22), P = 0.0001], and 2 years after EOT [1.05 (0.95-1.16), P < 0.0001] compared with baseline [1.27 (1.11-1.49)]. In patients with a relapse (n = 26), Vs did not significantly decrease at EOT [1.23 (1.12-1.55)], 1 year after EOT [1.20 (1.12-1.80)], and 2 years after EOT [1.41 (1.08-2.01)] compared with baseline [1.39 (1.15-1.57)]. In patients with a nonvirological response (n = 20), Vs did not significantly decrease at EOT [1.64 (1.43-2.06)], 1 year after EOT [1.66 (1.30-1.95)], and 2 years after EOT [1.61 (1.36-2.37)] compared with baseline [1.80 (1.54-2.01)]. Among genotype 1 patients, baseline Vs was significantly lower in SVR patients [1.28 (1.04-1.40)] than in non-SVR patients [1.56 (1.20-1.83)] (P = 0.0142).
conclusionReduction of Vs values was shown in SVR patients after IFN-plus-RBV therapy by acoustic radiation force impulse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.