Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26401057›Full record

ArticleJournal of economic literature2015

Health and the Economy in the United States, from 1750 to the Present.

Dora Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of economic literature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biogenesis of Au Nanoparticles from Plant-Derived Metabolites -ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Are Lockdowns Effective in Managing Pandemics?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dora CostaUCLA and NBER.

Funding

THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1870-1940P01AG010120 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI COSTA, DORA L · 1992 to 2018
$31.5M
THE IMPACT OF CHILDHOOD HEALTH ON ADULT HEALTH ANDECONOMICS STATUSP01AG029409 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BIANCHI, SUZANNE M. · 2007 to 2017
$16.7M
Family Dynamics, Fertility, and Investments in Children Across Generations - Administrative SupplementR01HD069609 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Thomas Fraser Crossley · 2011 to 2026
$14.2M
Statistics and Methods CoreR24HD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CAMPBELL, CAMERON DOUGALL · 2001 to 2016
$10.1M
Older Age Health and Longevity: A Long-Term ViewR01AG019637 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI COSTA, DORA L · 2002 to 2006
$736k
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG010120NIA NIH HHS P01 AG029409NIA NIH HHS R01 AG019637NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069609NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

I discuss the health transition in the United States, bringing new data to bear on health indicators, and investigating the changing relationship between health, income, and the environment. I argue that scientific advances played an outsize role and that health improvements were largest among the poor. Health improvements were not a precondition for modern economic growth. The gains to health are largest when the economy has moved from "brawn" to "brains" because this is when the wage returns to education are high, leading the healthy to obtain more education. More education may improve use of health knowledge, producing a virtuous cycle.

Identifiers

PMID26401057
PMCPMC4577070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.