Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26400942›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Histone Deacetylase Inhibition via RGFP966 Releases the Brakes on Sensory Cortical Plasticity and the Specificity of Memory Formation.

Kasia M Bieszczad, Kiro Bechay, James R Rusche, Vincent Jacques, Shashi Kudugunti, Wenyan Miao, Norman M Weinberger, James L McGaugh, Marcelo A Wood

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Histone deacetylases and their inhibitors in kidney diseases.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kasia M BieszczadDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory and Center for Hearing Research, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, College for Life Sciences, Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, 14193 Berlin, Germany, Psychology Department, Behavioral and Systems Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, and kasia.bie@rutgers.edu mwood@uci.edu.
Kiro BechayDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8897-2431
James R RuscheRepligen Corporation, Waltham, Massachusetts 02453.
Vincent JacquesRepligen Corporation, Waltham, Massachusetts 02453.
Shashi KuduguntiRepligen Corporation, Waltham, Massachusetts 02453.
Wenyan MiaoRepligen Corporation, Waltham, Massachusetts 02453.
Norman M WeinbergerDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory and Center for Hearing Research, University of California, Irvine, California 92697.
James L McGaughDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory and.
Marcelo A WoodDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory and Center for Hearing Research, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, kasia.bie@rutgers.edu mwood@uci.edu.
Repligen (United States) · USInstitute of Neurobiology · BGUniversity of California, Irvine · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Molecular epigenetics of auditory memory and cortical plasticityR03DC014753 · NIDCD · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI BIESZCZAD, KASIA · 2015 to 2017
$455k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC014753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research over the past decade indicates a novel role for epigenetic mechanisms in memory formation. Of particular interest is chromatin modification by histone deacetylases (HDACs), which, in general, negatively regulate transcription. HDAC deletion or inhibition facilitates transcription during memory consolidation and enhances long-lasting forms of synaptic plasticity and long-term memory. A key open question remains: How does blocking HDAC activity lead to memory enhancements? To address this question, we tested whether a normal function of HDACs is to gate information processing during memory formation. We used a class I HDAC inhibitor, RGFP966 (C21H19FN4O), to test the role of HDAC inhibition for information processing in an auditory memory model of learning-induced cortical plasticity. HDAC inhibition may act beyond memory enhancement per se to instead regulate information in ways that lead to encoding more vivid sensory details into memory. Indeed, we found that RGFP966 controls memory induction for acoustic details of sound-to-reward learning. Rats treated with RGFP966 while learning to associate sound with reward had stronger memory and additional information encoded into memory for highly specific features of sounds associated with reward. Moreover, behavioral effects occurred with unusually specific plasticity in primary auditory cortex (A1). Class I HDAC inhibition appears to engage A1 plasticity that enables additional acoustic features to become encoded in memory. Thus, epigenetic mechanisms act to regulate sensory cortical plasticity, which offers an information processing mechanism for gating what and how much is encoded to produce exceptionally persistent and vivid memories. Significance statement: Here we provide evidence of an epigenetic mechanism for information processing. The study reveals that a class I HDAC inhibitor (Malvaez et al., 2013; Rumbaugh et al., 2015; RGFP966, chemical formula C21H19FN4O) alters the formation of auditory memory by enabling more acoustic information to become encoded into memory. Moreover, RGFP966 appears to affect cortical plasticity: the primary auditory cortex reorganized in a manner that was unusually "tuned-in" to the specific sound cues and acoustic features that were related to reward and subsequently remembered. We propose that HDACs control "informational capture" at a systems level for what and how much information is encoded by gating sensory cortical plasticity that underlies the sensory richness of newly formed memories.

Indexed as

AcrylamidesAnimalsAuditory CortexConditioning, OperantEvoked PotentialsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesMaleMemoryNeuronal PlasticityPhenylenediaminesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeStatistics, NonparametricTime FactorsAcrylamidesHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesPhenylenediaminesRGFP966auditory cortexchromatin modificationcortical plasticityepigeneticshistone acetylationmemory

Identifiers

PMID26400942
PMCPMC4579377
OpenAlexW1465652382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.