Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26400814›Full record

ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2015

Role of Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Cancers.

Raghu Aarthy, Samson Mani, Sridevi Velusami, Shirley Sundarsingh, Thangarajan Rajkumar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ligation-assisted target recycling for DNA nanoswitch biosensors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Saliva Diagnostics.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raghu AarthyDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, 600036, India.
Samson ManiDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, 600036, India.
Sridevi VelusamiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.
Shirley SundarsinghDepartment of Onco-pathology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India.
Thangarajan RajkumarDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, 600036, India. drtrajkumar@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsy is a term used to describe non-invasive tests, which provide information about disease conditions through analysis of circulating cell-free DNA and circulating tumor cells from peripheral blood samples. In patients with cancer, the concentration of cell-free DNA increases, and structural, sequence, and epigenetic changes to DNA can be observed through the disease process and during therapy. Furthermore, cell-free DNA released by the tumor contains the same variants as those in the tumor cells. Therefore, cell-free DNA allows non-invasive assessment of cancer in real time. This review summarizes the origin of cell-free DNA, recent advancements in the detection of cell-free DNA, a possible role in metastasis, and its importance as a non-invasive diagnostic assay for cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticDNA, NeoplasmHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkers, TumorDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.