Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26400708›Full record

ArticlePublic health action2014

Fostering interest in research: evaluation of an introductory research seminar at hospitals in rural Rwanda.

M K Iribagiza, A Manikuzwe, T Aquino, C Amoroso, R Zachariah, J van Griensven, S Schneider, K Finnegan, C Cortas, E Kamanzi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health action, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

M K IribagizaPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda ; International Health Science University, Kampala, Uganda.
A ManikuzwePartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda.
T AquinoPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda.
C AmorosoPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda.
R ZachariahMédecins Sans Frontières Luxembourg, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
J van GriensvenInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
S SchneiderMédecins Sans Frontières Luxembourg, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
K FinneganPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda ; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
C CortasPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda ; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
E KamanziPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda.
J K HamonPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda.
B L Hedt-GauthierPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA ; National University of Rwanda School of Public Health, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingsPartners In Health Rwanda, in collaboration with the Ministry of Health, leads a multipronged approach to develop research capacity among health workers, particularly in rural areas.

objectivesTo describe the characteristics of participants and to assess the impact of an introductory research seminar series in three district hospitals in rural Rwanda.

designThis was a retrospective cohort study of seminar participants. Data were sourced from personnel records, assessment sheets and feedback forms.

resultsA total of 126 participants, including 70 (56%) clinical and 56 (44%) non-clinical staff, attended the research seminar series; 61 (48%) received certification. Among those certified, the median assessment score on assignments was 79%. Participants read significantly more articles at 6 and 12 months (median 2 and 4 respectively, compared to 1 at baseline, P < 0.01). There was also a significant increase (P ⩽ 0.05) in self-reported involvement in research studies (28%, baseline; 59%, 12 months) and attendance at other research training (36%, baseline; 65%, 12 months).

conclusionThe introductory research seminar series provided an important opportunity for engagement in research among clinical and non-clinical staff. Such an activity is a key component of a comprehensive research capacity building programme at rural sites, and serves as an entry point for more advanced research training.

Indexed as

capacity buildingoperational researchresearch capacitySORT IT

Identifiers

PMID26400708
PMCPMC4533506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.