Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26400259›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Optogenetic study of the projections from the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis to the central amygdala.

Nur Zeynep Gungor, Ryo Yamamoto, Denis Paré

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CRHMolecular psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Limbic Neuropeptidergic Modulators of Emotion and Their Therapeutic Potential for Anxiety and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nur Zeynep GungorCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, New Jersey.
Ryo YamamotoCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, New Jersey.
Denis ParéCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, New Jersey pare@andromeda.rutgers.edu.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Functional Organization of the Bed Nucleus of the Stria TerminalisR01MH098738 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI PARE, DENIS · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098738NIMH NIH HHS R01MH-098738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been proposed that the central amygdala (CeA), particularly its medial sector (CeM), generates brief fear responses to discrete conditioned cues, whereas the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) promotes long-lasting, anxiety-like states in response to more diffuse contingencies. Although it is believed that BNST-CeA interactions determine the transition between short- and long-duration responses, the nature of these interactions remains unknown. To shed light on this question, we used a double viral strategy to drive the expression of channelrhodopsin (ChR2) in BNST cells that project to CeA. Next, using patch-clamp recordings in vitro, we investigated the connectivity of infected cells to noninfected cells in BNST and compared the influence of BNST axons on neurons in the medial and lateral (CeL) parts of CeA. CeA-projecting BNST cells were concentrated in the anterolateral (AL) and anteroventral (AV) sectors of BNST. Dense plexuses of BNST axons were observed throughout CeA. In CeA and BNST, light-evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials accounted for a minority of responses (0-9% of tested cells); inhibition prevailed. The incidence of inhibitory responses was higher in CeM than in CeL (66% and 43% of tested cells, respectively). Within BNST, the connections from CeA-projecting to non-CeA-targeting cells varied as a function of the BNST sector: 50% vs. 9% of tested cells exhibited light-evoked responses in BNST-AL vs. BNST-AV, respectively. Overall, these results suggest that via its projection to CeA, BNST exerts an inhibitory influence over cued fear and that BNST neurons projecting to CeA form contrasting connections in different BNST subnuclei.

Indexed as

OptogeneticsAction PotentialsAnimalsCentral Amygdaloid NucleusChannelrhodopsinsExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsInhibitory Postsynaptic PotentialsMaleNeural PathwaysNeuronsRats, Inbred LewSeptal NucleiChannelrhodopsinsanxietyBNSTcentral amygdalafear

Identifiers

PMID26400259
PMCPMC4737411
OpenAlexW2176278505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.