Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26400064›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Comparison of individual and pooled stool samples for the assessment of intensity of Schistosoma mansoni and soil-transmitted helminth infections using the Kato-Katz technique.

Ashenafi Kure, Zeleke Mekonnen, Daniel Dana, Mitiku Bajiro, Mio Ayana, Jozef Vercruysse, Bruno Levecke

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Comparative evaluation of Midi ParasepParasites & vectors · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashenafi KurePublic Health Laboratory, Southern Nations Nationalities and People's Regional State Health Bureau, Hawassa, Ethiopia. ashenafikure@gmail.com.
Zeleke MekonnenDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences and Pathology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. zeleke.mekonnen@ju.edu.et.
Daniel DanaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences and Pathology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. daniel.dana@ju.edu.et.
Mitiku BajiroDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences and Pathology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. mitiku.bajiro@ju.edu.et.
Mio AyanaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences and Pathology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. mio.ayana@ju.edu.et.
Jozef VercruysseDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium. jozef.vercruysse@ugent.be.
Bruno LeveckeDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium. bruno.levecke@ugent.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur group has recently provided a proof-of-principle for the examination of pooled stool samples using McMaster technique as a strategy for the rapid assessment of intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections (STH, Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and hookworm). In the present study we evaluated this pooling strategy for the assessment of intensity of both STH and Schistosoma mansoni infections using the Kato-Katz technique.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in 360 children aged 5-18 years from six schools in Jimma Zone (southwest Ethiopia). We performed faecal egg counts (FECs) in both individual and pooled samples (pools sizes of 5, 10 and 20) to estimate the number of eggs per gram of stool (EPG) using the Kato-Katz technique. We also assessed the time to screen both individual and pooled samples.

resultsExcept for hookworms, there was a significant correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.53-0.95) between the mean of individual FECs and the FECs of pooled samples for A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura and S. mansoni, regardless of the pool size. Mean FEC were 2,596 EPG, 125 EPG, 47 EPG, and 41 EPG for A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, S. mansoni and hookworm, respectively. There was no significant difference in FECs between the examination of individual and pooled stool samples, except for hookworms. For this STH, pools of 10 resulted in a significant underestimation of infection intensity. The total time to obtain individual FECs was 65 h 5 min. For pooled FECs, this was 19 h 12 min for pools of 5, 14 h 39 min for pools of 10 and 12 h 42 min for pools of 20.

conclusionsThe results indicate that pooling of stool sample holds also promise as a rapid assessment of infections intensity for STH and S. mansoni using the Kato-Katz technique. In this setting, the time in the laboratory was reduced by 70 % when pools of 5 instead of individual stool samples were screened.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolEthiopiaFecesFemaleHelminthiasisHelminthsHumansMaleParasite Egg CountSchistosoma mansoniSchistosomiasis mansoniSoilSoil

Identifiers

PMID26400064
PMCPMC4581403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.