Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26399968›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

The impact of residual infections on Anopheles-transmitted Wuchereria bancrofti after multiple rounds of mass drug administration.

Dziedzom K de Souza, Rashid Ansumana, Santigie Sessay, Abu Conteh, Benjamin Koudou, Maria P Rebollo, Joseph Koroma, Daniel A Boakye, Moses J Bockarie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Threat of Vector-Borne Diseases in Sierra Leone.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Dziedzom K de SouzaNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana. ddesouza@noguchi.ug.edu.gh.
Rashid AnsumanaCentre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. rashidansumana@gmail.com.
Santigie SessayMinistry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone. sanniesay@gmail.com.
Abu ContehMinistry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone. abu_conteh21@yahoo.co.uk.
Benjamin KoudouCentre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. Benjamin.Koudou@lstmed.ac.uk.
Maria P RebolloTask Force for Global health, Atlanta, USA. mrebollo@taskforce.org.
Joseph KoromaCentre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. jkoroma@fhi360.org.
Daniel A BoakyeNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana. dboakye@noguchi.ug.edu.gh.
Moses J BockarieCentre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. Moses.Bockarie@lstmed.as.uk.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBMinistry of Health and Sanitation · SLUniversity of Ghana · GHThe Task Force for Global Health · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany countries have made significant progress in the implementation of World Health Organization recommended preventive chemotherapy strategy, to eliminate lymphatic filariasis (LF). However, pertinent challenges such as the existence of areas of residual infections in disease endemic districts pose potential threats to the achievements made. Thus, this study was undertaken to assess the importance of these areas in implementation units (districts) where microfilaria (MF) positive individuals could not be found during the mid-term assessment after three rounds of mass drug administration.

methodsThis study was undertaken in Bo and Pujehun, two LF endemic districts of Sierra Leone, with baseline MF prevalence of 2 % and 0 % respectively in sentinel sites for monitoring impact of the national programme. Study communities in the districts were purposefully selected and an assessment of LF infection prevalence was conducted together with entomological investigations undertaken to determine the existence of areas with residual MF that could enable transmission by local vectors. The transmission Assessment Survey (TAS) protocol described by WHO was applied in the two districts to determine infection of LF in 6-7 year old children who were born before MDA against LF started.

resultsThe results indicated the presence of MF infected children in Pujehun district. An. gambiae collected in the district were also positive for W. bancrofti, even though the prevalence of infection was below the threshold associated with active transmission.

conclusionsResidual infection was detected after three rounds of MDA in Pujehun--a district of 0 % Mf prevalence at the sentinel site. Nevertheless, our results showed that the transmission was contained in a small area. With the scale up of vector control in Anopheles transmission zones, some areas of residual infection may not pose a serious threat for the resurgence of LF if the prevalence of infections observed during TAS are below the threshold required for active transmission of the parasite. However, robust surveillance strategies capable of detecting residual infections must be implemented, together with entomological assessments to determine if ongoing vector control activities, biting rates and infection rates of the vectors can support the transmission of the disease. Furthermore, in areas where mid-term assessments reveal MF prevalence below 1 % or 2 % antigen level, in Anopheles transmission areas with active and effective malaria vector control efforts, the minimum 5 rounds of MDA may not be required before implementing TAS. Thus, we propose a modification of the WHO recommendation for the timing of sentinel and spot-check site assessments in national programs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsAnophelesAnthelminticsChildElephantiasis, FilarialEndemic DiseasesFemaleHumansInsect VectorsMaleMiddle AgedSierra LeoneWuchereria bancroftiAnthelmintics

Identifiers

PMID26399968
PMCPMC4581406
OpenAlexW2116269207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.