Trial reportScientific reports2015
Noninvasive Ventilation for Preterm Twin Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants as primary mode: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation vs continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with RDS: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic scoping review of the use of surfactant replacement therapy for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm neonates in low- and middle-income countries.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary respiratory support strategies for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Pooled it
- Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Noninvasive Ventilation with Heliox for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Canadian respiratory journal · 2016Pooled it
- High-Frequency Oscillation vs Mechanical Ventilation for Neonatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Predictors and outcomes of successful primary nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in extremely preterm infants: A retrospective observational study.Qatar medical journal · 2025Trial
- Correlation between nasal anatomical characteristics in newborns and short binasal prong dimensions.Jornal de pediatria · 2023Article
- Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Continuing interventions in a quality improvement bundle to reduce bronchopulmonary dysplasia.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2022Article
- Safety and efficacy of a novel double-lumen tracheal tube in neonates with RDS: A prospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Non-invasive Respiratory Support of the Premature Neonate: From Physics to Bench to Practice.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Review
- Three non-invasive ventilation strategies for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a propensity score analysis.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2020Article
- Heated Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula (HHHFNC) is not an effective method for initial treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) versus nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP).Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2019Article
- [Application of real world study in neonatal medicine].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Noninvasive ventilation has been proven to be effective strategies for reducing the need for endotracheal ventilation in preterm infant with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), however the best option needs to be further determined. A single center, paired design, randomized, controlled trial was conducted between Jan 2011 and July 2014. Preterm twins with RDS were included. One of a pair was randomized to NIPPV, while another to NCPAP. Surfactant was administrated as rescue treatment. The primary outcome was the need for endotracheal ventilation. The secondary outcomes were the complications. 143 pairs were randomized and 129 pairs finished the trial. The rates of endotracheal ventilation did not differ significantly between NIPPV and NCPAP groups (11.9% vs 19.6%, P = 0.080). This difference was not observed in the subgroup of infants who received surfactant therapy (11.1% vs 19.7%, P = 0.087). No secondary outcomes also differed significantly between the two groups. NIPPV did not result in a significantly lower incidence of intubation as compared with NCPAP in preterm twins with RDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.