Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26399575›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Using an internet intervention to support self-management of low back pain in primary care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial (SupportBack).

Adam W A Geraghty, Rosie Stanford, Paul Little, Lisa Roberts, Nadine E Foster, Jonathan C Hill, Elaine Hay, Beth Stuart, David Turner, Lucy Yardley

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adam W A GeraghtyDepartment of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Rosie StanfordDepartment of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Paul LittleDepartment of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Lisa RobertsDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Nadine E FosterResearch Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Jonathan C HillResearch Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Elaine HayResearch Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Beth StuartDepartment of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
David TurnerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Lucy YardleyCentre for Applications of Health Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-015Department of Health PB-PG-1111-26080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLow back pain (LBP) is a prevalent and costly condition. The majority of patients experiencing LBP are managed in primary care, where first-line care recommendations consist of advice to self-manage and remain active. Internet interventions present a potential means of providing patients with tailored self-management advice and evidence-based support for increasing physical activity. METHODS/ANALYSIS: This protocol describes a single-blind, randomised controlled feasibility trial of an internet intervention developed to support the self-management of LBP in primary care. Patients are being randomised to 1 of 3 groups receiving either usual primary care, usual primary care with the addition of an internet intervention or an internet intervention with physiotherapist telephone support. Patients are followed up at 3 months. Primary outcomes are the feasibility of (1) the trial design/methods, (2) the delivery of the internet intervention and (3) the provision of telephone support by physiotherapists. Secondary outcomes will include exploratory analysis of estimates and variation in clinical outcomes of pain and disability, in order to inform a future main trial. ETHICS/DISSEMINATION: This feasibility trial has undergone ethical scrutiny and been approved by the National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committee, REC Reference 13/SC/0202. The feasibility findings will be disseminated to the research community through presentations at conferences and publication in peer review journals. Broader dissemination will come following a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 31034004.

Indexed as

InternetAdultAgedExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPatient Education as TopicPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeYoung AdultPRIMARY CAREREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID26399575
PMCPMC4593135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.