Trial reportBMJ open2015
Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with tinnitus in the UK: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02370810 (CBT-based Internet Intervention for Adults With Tinnitus in the United Kingdom), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CBT-based Internet Intervention for Adults With Tinnitus in the United Kingdom: A Randomise Controlled Trial
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- The Current State of Evidence Regarding Audiologist-Provided Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for the Management of Tinnitus: A Scoping Review.Audiology research · 2024Article
- A Review of Contemporary Teleaudiology: Literature Review, Technology, and Considerations for Practicing.Journal of audiology & otology · 2021Review
- Long-Term Efficacy of Audiologist-Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Tinnitus.American journal of audiology · 2018Article
- Findings and Ethical Considerations From a Thematic Analysis of Threads Within Tinnitus Online Support Groups.American journal of audiology · 2018Article
- Tinnitus services in the United Kingdom: a survey of patient experiences.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Review of Smart Services for Tinnitus Self-Help, Diagnostics and Treatments.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Review
- Development and technical functionality of an Internet-based intervention for tinnitus in the UK.Internet interventions · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTinnitus is one of the most distressing hearing-related symptoms. Innovative ways of managing tinnitus distress and the related healthcare burden of treating tinnitus are required. An internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) intervention has been developed in Sweden to improve access to evidence-based tinnitus treatments. This study aims to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of iCBT in reducing the impact associated with tinnitus, in the UK. It, furthermore, aims to establish whether there are subgroups of tinnitus sufferers for whom this iCBT intervention may be more suitable. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A two-armed randomised control trial--with a 1-year follow-up design--will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of iCBT on tinnitus distress. A delayed treatment design using a weekly check-in control group will be used. 70 participants will be randomly assigned to each group by an independent researcher by using a computer-generated randomisation schedule, and after being prestratified for age and tinnitus severity. They will undergo the iCBT e-health intervention online together with audiological therapeutic support. The main outcome measure is the Tinnitus Functional Index. Process evaluation of the intervention will also be conducted. Data analysis will be in accordance with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted. If this intervention proves effective, it may be possible that at least some tinnitus sufferers can be managed though an iCBT e-learning treatment programme. This would be cost effective and potentially will free up services for those with more severe problems that need face-to-face treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02370810, date 05/03/2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.