Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26399571›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with tinnitus in the UK: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Eldré W Beukes, Vinaya Manchaiah, Peter M Allen, David M Baguley, Gerhard Andersson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02370810 (CBT-based Internet Intervention for Adults With Tinnitus in the United Kingdom), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02370810 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

CBT-based Internet Intervention for Adults With Tinnitus in the United Kingdom: A Randomise Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnglia Ruskin UniversityRan2016 to 2017Enrolled146ConditionsTinnitusArmsCBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eldré W BeukesDepartment of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Vinaya ManchaiahDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas, USA Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Audiology India, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
Peter M AllenDepartment of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK Vision and Eye Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
David M BaguleyDepartment of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK Audiology Department, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Gerhard AnderssonDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTinnitus is one of the most distressing hearing-related symptoms. Innovative ways of managing tinnitus distress and the related healthcare burden of treating tinnitus are required. An internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) intervention has been developed in Sweden to improve access to evidence-based tinnitus treatments. This study aims to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of iCBT in reducing the impact associated with tinnitus, in the UK. It, furthermore, aims to establish whether there are subgroups of tinnitus sufferers for whom this iCBT intervention may be more suitable. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A two-armed randomised control trial--with a 1-year follow-up design--will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of iCBT on tinnitus distress. A delayed treatment design using a weekly check-in control group will be used. 70 participants will be randomly assigned to each group by an independent researcher by using a computer-generated randomisation schedule, and after being prestratified for age and tinnitus severity. They will undergo the iCBT e-health intervention online together with audiological therapeutic support. The main outcome measure is the Tinnitus Functional Index. Process evaluation of the intervention will also be conducted. Data analysis will be in accordance with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted. If this intervention proves effective, it may be possible that at least some tinnitus sufferers can be managed though an iCBT e-learning treatment programme. This would be cost effective and potentially will free up services for those with more severe problems that need face-to-face treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02370810, date 05/03/2015.

Indexed as

AdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternetMaleQuality of LifeTelemedicineTinnitusTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26399571
PMCPMC4593165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.