ArticlePediatric surgery international2015
Outcomes in infants with prenatally diagnosed gastroschisis and planned preterm delivery.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: foetal gastroschisis with ideal pregnancy outcomes under multidisciplinary treatment management.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- The influence of gestational age, mode of delivery and abdominal wall closure method on the surgical outcome of neonates with uncomplicated gastroschisis.Pediatric surgery international · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe timing and mode of delivery of pregnancies with prenatally diagnosed gastroschisis remains controversial.
aimTo evaluate the outcome of patients with gastroschisis managed during two time periods: 2006-2009 and 2010-2014, with planned elective cesarean delivery at 37 versus 35 gestational weeks (gw). A secondary aim was to analyze the outcome in relation to the gestational age at birth. MATERIAL AND
methodsRetrospective review of all cases with gastroschisis managed at our institution between 2006 and 2014.
resultsFifty-two patients were identified, 24 during the initial period, and 28 during the second. There were a significantly higher number of emergency cesarean deliveries in the first period. There were no differences between groups with regard to the use of preformed silo, need of parenteral nutrition or length of hospital stay. When analyzing the outcome in relation to the gw the patients actually were born, we observed that patients delivered between 35 and 36.9 gw were primary closed in 88.5% of cases, with shorter time on mechanical ventilation, parenteral nutrition and hospital stay.
conclusionPlanned caesarian section at 35 completed gestational weeks for fetuses with prenatally diagnosed gastroschisis is safe. We observe the best outcome for patients born between 35 and 36.9 gw.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26399421What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.