ReviewBrain, behavior and evolution2015
Sound Localization Strategies in Three Predators.
Review in Brain, behavior and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gharial acoustic signaling: Novel underwater pops are temporally based, context-dependent, seasonally stable, male-specific, and individually distinctive.Journal of anatomy · 2025Article
- Vocal Call Locator Benchmark (VCL) for localizing rodent vocalizations from multi-channel audio.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Sound categorization by crocodilians.iScience · 2023Article
- Spatial release from masking in crocodilians.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Strongly directional responses to tones and conspecific calls in the auditory nerve of the Tokay gecko,Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Behavioral and neuronal underpinnings of safety in numbers in fruit flies.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Thalamic, cortical, and amygdala involvement in the processing of a natural sound cue of danger.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Cooperative population coding facilitates efficient sound-source separability by adaptation to input statistics.PLoS biology · 2019Article
- A novel concept for dynamic adjustment of auditory space.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Frogs Exploit Statistical Regularities in Noisy Acoustic Scenes to Solve Cocktail-Party-like Problems.Current biology : CB · 2017Article
- Evolution of Sound Source Localization Circuits in the Nonmammalian Vertebrate Brainstem.Brain, behavior and evolution · 2017Article
- Evolutionary trends in directional hearing.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2016Review
- Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.Biological cybernetics · 2016Review
- Article
- Against the Epistemological Primacy of the Hardware: The Brain from Inside Out, Turned Upside Down.eNeuroArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we compare some of the neural strategies for sound localization and encoding interaural time differences (ITDs) in three predatory species of Reptilia, alligators, barn owls and geckos. Birds and crocodilians are sister groups among the extant archosaurs, while geckos are lepidosaurs. Despite the similar organization of their auditory systems, archosaurs and lizards use different strategies for encoding the ITDs that underlie localization of sound in azimuth. Barn owls encode ITD information using a place map, which is composed of neurons serving as labeled lines tuned for preferred spatial locations, while geckos may use a meter strategy or population code composed of broadly sensitive neurons that represent ITD via changes in the firing rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.