Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26397878›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2015

Guidelines for reporting methodological challenges and evaluating potential bias in dementia research.

Jennifer Weuve, Cécile Proust-Lima, Melinda C Power, Alden L Gross, Scott M Hofer, Rodolphe Thiébaut, Geneviève Chêne, M Maria Glymour, Carole Dufouil, MELODEM Initiative

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 152 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Effect of a cash transfer intervention on memory decline and dementia probability in older adults in rural South Africa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The policy exposome of dementia: Gaps, opportunities, and research agenda.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer WeuveRush Institute for Healthy Aging, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cécile Proust-LimaINSERM U897, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Center, Bordeaux School of Public Health, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France.
Melinda C PowerDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alden L GrossDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Johns Hopkins Center on Aging and Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Scott M HoferDepartment of Psychology and Centre on Aging, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Rodolphe ThiébautINSERM U897, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Center, Bordeaux School of Public Health, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France; Clinical Investigation Center-Clinical Epidemiology-CIC-1401 of INSERM U897, Bordeaux, France; Bordeaux University Hospital (Public Health Department), Bordeaux, France.
Geneviève ChêneINSERM U897, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Center, Bordeaux School of Public Health, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France; Clinical Investigation Center-Clinical Epidemiology-CIC-1401 of INSERM U897, Bordeaux, France; Bordeaux University Hospital (Public Health Department), Bordeaux, France.
M Maria GlymourDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Heath, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Carole DufouilINSERM U897, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Center, Bordeaux School of Public Health, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France; Clinical Investigation Center-Clinical Epidemiology-CIC-1401 of INSERM U897, Bordeaux, France; Bordeaux University Hospital (Public Health Department), Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: carole.dufouil@inserm.fr.
MELODEM Initiative

Funding

Study Coordination and Measurement CoreP01AG043362 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HOFER, SCOTT M. · 2013 to 2017
$7.8M
Research Training in Age-Related Cognitive DisordersT32AG027668 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARILYN S. ALBERT · 2007 to 2026
$6.3M
Integrative Analysis of Change in Cognition and HealthR01AG026453 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA · PI HOFER, SCOTT M. · 2007 to 2011
$2.0M
Integrative analysis of genomic and epigenomic architecture in cognitive declineK25AG041906 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHIBNIK, LORI BETH · 2012 to 2016
$771k
Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution and to Disability in Older AdultsR21ES020404 · NIEHS · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WEUVE, JENNIFER · 2012 to 2013
$458k
Functional Impairment from Stroke: an Exploratory Study of DisparitiesR21AG034385 · NIA · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI GLYMOUR, MEDELLENA MARIA · 2010 to 2011
$352k
Big Questions in Cognitive Aging: An Integrative Analysis ApproachR03AG045494 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GROSS, ALDEN L. · 2013 to 2013
$81k
Medical Research Council G0902108NIA NIH HHS K25 AG041906NIA NIH HHS P01 AG043362NIA NIH HHS P01AG043362NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026453NIA NIH HHS R01AG026453NIA NIH HHS R03 AG045494NIA NIH HHS R03AG045494NIA NIH HHS R21 AG034385NIA NIH HHS T32 AG027668NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES020404NIEHS NIH HHS R21ES020404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical and population research on dementia and related neurologic conditions, including Alzheimer's disease, faces several unique methodological challenges. Progress to identify preventive and therapeutic strategies rests on valid and rigorous analytic approaches, but the research literature reflects little consensus on "best practices." We present findings from a large scientific working group on research methods for clinical and population studies of dementia, which identified five categories of methodological challenges as follows: (1) attrition/sample selection, including selective survival; (2) measurement, including uncertainty in diagnostic criteria, measurement error in neuropsychological assessments, and practice or retest effects; (3) specification of longitudinal models when participants are followed for months, years, or even decades; (4) time-varying measurements; and (5) high-dimensional data. We explain why each challenge is important in dementia research and how it could compromise the translation of research findings into effective prevention or care strategies. We advance a checklist of potential sources of bias that should be routinely addressed when reporting dementia research.

Indexed as

DementiaPractice Guidelines as TopicResearch DesignBiasHumansAlzheimer diseaseBig dataBrain imagingDementiaEpidemiologic factorsGenomicsLongitudinal studiesNeuropsychological testsSelection biasStatistical modelsSurvival bias

Identifiers

PMID26397878
PMCPMC4655106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.