Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26397842›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2015

Variation in the Contents of Sepsis Bundles and Quality Measures. A Systematic Review.

Rachel D Kramer, Colin R Cooke, Vincent Liu, Russell R Miller, Theodore J Iwashyna

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Keeping It Simple in Sepsis Measures.Journal of hospital medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel D Kramer1 University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Colin R Cooke2 University of Michigan Pulmonary and Critical Care, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Vincent Liu3 Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California.
Russell R Miller4 Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah.
Theodore J Iwashyna2 University of Michigan Pulmonary and Critical Care, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

Data-driven Precision medicine in sepsisK23GM112018 · NIGMS · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LIU, VINCENT · 2014 to 2017
$768k
Understanding Variation in the Use of Critical Care ServicesK08HS020672 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COOKE, COLIN · 2012 to 2016
$768k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS020672AHRQ HHS K08HS020672NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM112018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleSepsis contributes to one in every two to three inpatient hospital deaths. Early recognition and treatment are instrumental in reducing mortality, yet there are substantial quality gaps. Sepsis bundles containing quality metrics are often used in efforts to improve outcomes. Several prominent organizations have published their own bundles, but there are few head-to-head comparisons of content.

objectivesWe sought to determine the degree of agreement on component elements of sepsis bundles and the associated timing goals for completion of each element. We additionally sought to evaluate the amount of variation between metrics associated with bundles.

methodsWe reviewed the components of and level of agreement among several sepsis resuscitation and management bundles. We compared the individual bundle elements, together with their associated goals and metrics. We performed a systematic review (PubMed 2008-2015) and searched publically available online content, supplemented by interviews with key informants, to identify eight distinct bundles. Bundles are presented as current as of April 2015. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsBroadly, elements of care covered early resuscitation and short-term management. Bundles varied from 6 to 10 elements, and there were 12 distinct elements listed across all bundles. Only lactate collection and broad-spectrum antibiotics were common to all eight bundles, although there were seven elements included in at least 75% of the bundles. Timing goals for the collection of lactate and antibiotic administration varied among bundles from within 1 to 6 hours of diagnosis or admission. Notably, no bundle included metrics evaluating timeliness or completeness of sepsis recognition.

conclusionsThere is a lack of consensus on component elements and timing goals across highly recognized sepsis bundles. These differences highlight an urgent need for comparative effectiveness research to guide future implementation and for metrics to evaluate progress. None of the widely instituted bundles include metrics to evaluate sepsis recognition or diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsGuideline AdherenceHumansLength of StayOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareSepsisSeverity of Illness IndexAnti-Bacterial Agentsbundlesguidelinesquality improvementquality metricssepsis

Identifiers

PMID26397842
PMCPMC4724896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.