Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26397003›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2015

Fungal Biofilms: In Vivo Models for Discovery of Anti-Biofilm Drugs.

Jeniel E Nett, David R Andes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Antibiofilm activity of terbinafine, itraconazole and their combination against Sporothrix brasiliensis yeast-like form's biofilms.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. StudyingPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Biochanin A Inhibits the Growth and Biofilm ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Emerging Antifungal Targets and Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Characterization ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Oral Candidiasis: A Disease of Opportunity.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Testing Anti-Biofilm Polymeric Surfaces: Where to Start?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeniel E NettDepartment of Medicine and Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin, Madison WI 53706.
David R AndesDepartment of Medicine and Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin, Madison WI 53706.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Vesicle-mediated drug resistance of Candida albicans biofilmR01AI073289 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ANDES, DAVID R, MITCHELL, AARON P · 2008 to 2025
$7.9M
Mechanisms of Candida Biofilm Immune EvasionK08AI108727 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NETT, JENIEL E · 2014 to 2018
$960k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI108727NIAID NIH HHS NIH K08 AI108727NIAID NIH HHS NIH R01 AI073289NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During infection, fungi frequently transition to a biofilm lifestyle, proliferating as communities of surface-adherent aggregates of cells. Phenotypically, cells in a biofilm are distinct from free-floating cells. Their high tolerance of antifungals and ability to withstand host defenses are two characteristics that foster resilience. Biofilm infections are particularly difficult to eradicate, and most available antifungals have minimal activity. Therefore, the discovery of novel compounds and innovative strategies to treat fungal biofilms is of great interest. Although many fungi have been observed to form biofilms, the most well-studied is Candida albicans. Animal models have been developed to simulate common Candida device-associated infections, including those involving vascular catheters, dentures, urinary catheters, and subcutaneous implants. Models have also reproduced the most common mucosal biofilm infections: oropharyngeal and vaginal candidiasis. These models incorporate the anatomical site, immune components, and fluid dynamics of clinical niches and have been instrumental in the study of drug resistance and investigation of novel therapies. This chapter describes the significance of fungal biofilm infections, the animal models developed for biofilm study, and how these models have contributed to the development of new strategies for the eradication of fungal biofilm infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisAspergillusBiofilmsCandida albicansCandidiasisCathetersCell AdhesionDenturesDisease Models, AnimalDrug Resistance, FungalHumansMiceProstheses and ImplantsStomatitis, DentureAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID26397003
PMCPMC4581467
OpenAlexW2196467308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.