ArticleScientific data2015
Comment: Making data count.
Article in Scientific data, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The tragedy of the biodiversity data commons: a data impediment creeping nigher?Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Pooled it
- Data science and its future in large neuroscience collaborations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Seek and you may (not) find: A multi-institutional analysis of where research data are shared.PloS one · 2024Article
- Assessing resource use: a case study with the Human Disease Ontology.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023Article
- How do properties of data, their curation, and their funding relate to reuse?Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · 2022Article
- Microbiome Metadata Standards: Report of the National Microbiome Data Collaborative's Workshop and Follow-On Activities.mSystems · 2021Article
- Identifying Data Sharing and Reuse with Scholix: Potentials and Limitations.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Datastorr: a workflow and package for delivering successive versions of 'evolving data' directly into R.GigaScience · 2019Article
- How open science helps researchers succeed.eLife · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.