Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26396549›Full record

ReviewBiomarkers in cancer2015

BRAF Mutation in Colorectal Cancer: An Update.

David Barras

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomarkers in cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer.American journal of clinical pathology · 2017
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. BRAF mutation and tumor immune microenvironment in new era.American journal of cancer research · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. RETRACTED: The Impact ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. International journal of breast cancer · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. A novel prognostic model of methylation-associated genes in acute myeloid leukemia.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David BarrasSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Bioinformatics Core Facility, Lausanne, Switzerland.
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is still one of the deadliest cancer-related diseases. About 10% of CRC patients are characterized by a mutation in the B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) gene resulting in a valine-to-glutamate change at the residue 600 (V600E). This mutation is also present in more than 60% of melanoma patients. BRAF inhibitors were developed and found to improve patient survival; however, most patients at the end of the track ultimately develop resistance to these inhibitors. Melanoma patients benefit from the combination of BRAF inhibitors with mitogen/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitors, among others. Unfortunately, colorectal patients do not respond much efficiently, which suggests different resistance mechanisms between the two cancer types. This review aims at shedding light on recent discoveries that improve our understanding of the BRAF mutation biology in CRC.

Indexed as

biomarkerBRAFcolorectal cancerCRConcogene

Identifiers

PMID26396549
PMCPMC4562608
OpenAlexW2165083157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.