ReviewJournal of food science and technology2015
Trends in dairy and non-dairy probiotic products - a review.
Review in Journal of food science and technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of the Food Matrix on the Survival to the Gastrointestinal Transit of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CRL1505: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Study.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2025Trial
- Integrated Evaluation of the Fermentation Kinetics of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Tender Coconut Water Using Physicochemical Characterization and Mathematical Modelling.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Metabolomic profile of barnyard millet (Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Study of oat bran as substrate for obtaining functional ingredients containing Lactobacillus acidophilus.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Article
- Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Traditional Dry-Cured Fermented Foods with Probiotic Effect: Selection, Mechanisms of Action and Applications.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Hygienic Significance of Microbiota and Probiotics for Human Wellbeing.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Review
- Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus: An Overview of the Viability in Fruit and Vegetable Juices and Their Potential Effects on Human Health.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Review
- Fortification of Cereal-Based Food withFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fruit and Vegetable Juices as Functional Carriers for Probiotic Delivery: Microbiological, Nutritional, and Sensory Perspectives.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Enhancing Viability ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Probiotics: A multifaceted approach to health promotion-from disease prevention to food enrichment and delivery systems.AIMS microbiology · 2025Review
- Action and immunomodulatory mechanisms, formulations, and safety concerns of probiotics.Bioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2025Review
- Plant-based probiotic foods: current state and future trends.Food science and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Probio-Ichnos: A Database of Microorganisms with In Vitro Probiotic Properties.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- An overview of probiotic camel milk as a nutritional beverage: Challenges and perspectives.Food science & nutrition · 2024Review
- Dark chocolate: delivery medium for probioticJournal of food science and technology · 2024Article
- Milk andAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024Article
- Vegetable substrates as an alternative for the inclusion of lactic acid bacteria with probiotic potential in food matrices.Journal of food science and technology · 2024Review
- Characterization of a Fermented Beverage from Discarded Bread Flour Using Two Commercial Probiotics Starters.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Networked Interaction between Probiotics and Intestine in Health and Disease: A Promising Success Story.Microorganisms · 2024Review
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health awareness has grown to a greater extent among consumers and they are looking for healthy probiotic counterparts. Keeping in this view, the present review focuses recent developments in dairy and non-dairy probiotic products. All over the world, dairy probiotics are being commercialized in many different forms. However, the allergy and lactose intolerance are the major set-backs to dairy probiotics. Whereas, flavor and refreshing nature are the major advantages of non-dairy drinks, especially fruit juices. Phenotypic and genotypic similarities between dairy and non-dairy probiotics along with the matrix dependency of cell viability and cell functionality are reviewed. The heterogeneous food matrices of non-dairy food carriers are the major constraints for the survival of the probiotics, while the probiotic strains from non-dairy sources are satisfactory. Technological and functional properties, besides the viability of the probiotics used in fermented products of non-dairy origin are extremely important to get a competitive advantage in the world market. The functional attributes of dairy and non-dairy probiotic products are further enhanced by adding prebiotics such as galacto-oligosaccharide, fructo-oligosaccharide and inulin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.