Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26396074›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

High prevalence of trypanosomes in European badgers detected using ITS-PCR.

Eze J Ideozu, Andrew M Whiteoak, Alexandra J Tomlinson, Andrew Robertson, Richard J Delahay, Geoff Hide

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. European Brown hare (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Parasitology · 2021
    Article
  7. AutochthonousPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Increased Expression of Plasma-Induced ABCC1 mRNA in Cystic Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eze J IdeozuEcosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK. E.J.Ideozu@edu.salford.ac.uk.
Andrew M WhiteoakEcosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK. a.whiteoak@gmail.com.
Alexandra J TomlinsonNational Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodchester Park, Gloucestershire, GL10 3UJ, UK. ajtomlinson59@gmail.com.
Andrew RobertsonNational Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodchester Park, Gloucestershire, GL10 3UJ, UK. a.robertson@exeter.ac.uk.
Richard J DelahayNational Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodchester Park, Gloucestershire, GL10 3UJ, UK. dez.delahay@apha.gsi.gov.uk.
Geoff HideEcosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK. g.hide@salford.ac.uk.
University of Salford · GBAnimal and Plant Health Agency · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWildlife can be important sources and reservoirs for pathogens. Trypanosome infections are common in many mammalian species, and are pathogenic in some. Molecular detection tools were used to measure trypanosome prevalence in a well-studied population of wild European badgers (Meles meles).

findingsA nested ITS-PCR system, that targeted the ribosomal RNA gene locus, has been widely used to detect pathogenic human and animal trypanosomes in domestic animals in Africa and some wildlife hosts. Samples from a long-term DEFRA funded capture-mark-recapture study of wild badgers at Woodchester Park (Gloucestershire, SW England) were investigated for trypanosome prevalence. A total of 82 badger blood samples were examined by nested ITS-PCR. Twenty-nine of the samples were found to be positive for trypanosomes giving a prevalence of 35.4% (25.9% - 46.2%; 95% CI). Infection was not found to be linked to badger condition, sex or age. Analysis of DNA sequence data showed the badgers to be infected with Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) pestanai and phylogenetic analysis showed the Woodchester badger trypanosomes and T. pestanai to cluster in the Megatrypanum clade.

conclusionsThe results show that the ITS Nested PCR is an effective tool for diagnosing trypanosome infection in badgers and suggests that it could be widely used in wildlife species with unknown trypanosomes or mixed infections. The relatively high prevalence observed in these badgers raises the possibility that a significant proportion of UK badgers are naturally infected with trypanosomes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCluster AnalysisDNA, ProtozoanDNA, Ribosomal SpacerEnglandMolecular Sequence DataMustelidaePhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceSequence Analysis, DNATrypanosomaTrypanosomiasisDNA, ProtozoanDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID26396074
PMCPMC4580359
OpenAlexW2131485472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.