Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26395891›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2015

[The metastatic niche. Mechanisms and prognostic implications].

M H Muders, G B Baretton

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M H MudersInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum "Carl Gustav Carus" an der TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. michael.muders@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
G B BarettonInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum "Carl Gustav Carus" an der TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. gustavo.baretton@uniklinikum-dresden.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disseminated tumor cells require a special microenvironment to form metastases. This metastatic niche is organ specific and forms prior to the establishment of visible metastases. The niche is characterized by vascular remodeling and bone marrow-derived cells which have migrated into it. Studies by other groups and our own results have already shown that intranodal lymphangiogenesis is an important prerequisite for regional lymph node metastases in rectal cancer patients, and can be used as a prognostic marker for progression-free survival. Niche cells such as endothelia secrete factors that attract tumor and bone marrow-derived cells. CXCL12 is one of these factors. CXCL12 activates the CXCR4 chemokine axis and induces migration along its gradient. Several factors, such as hypoxia, have been described to regulate CXCR4 function and surface expression on tumor cells. Low molecular weight agents have been used to block CXCR4 activation. This review focuses on the function and regulation of CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12 in metastases formation. It also discusses potential options for therapeutic blockage.

Indexed as

Chemokine CXCL12Disease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm MetastasisOrgan SpecificityPrognosisReceptors, CXCR4Tumor MicroenvironmentChemokine CXCL12CXCL12 protein, humanCXCR4 protein, humanReceptors, CXCR4Lymphatic vessels, intranodalLymph node metastasisLymph nodes, locoregionalNeuropilinSurvival, progression-free

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.