Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26395774›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

The NULevel trial of a scalable, technology-assisted weight loss maintenance intervention for obese adults after clinically significant weight loss: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Elizabeth H Evans, Vera Araújo-Soares, Ashley Adamson, Alan M Batterham, Heather Brown, Miglena Campbell, Stephan U Dombrowski, Alison Guest, Daniel Jackson, Dominika Kwasnicka and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Do preferences differ based on respondent experience of a health issue and its treatment? A case study using a public health intervention.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth H EvansInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. elizabeth.evans@ncl.ac.uk.
Vera Araújo-SoaresInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. vera.araujo-soares@ncl.ac.uk.
Ashley AdamsonInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. ashley.adamson@ncl.ac.uk.
Alan M BatterhamHealth and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Parkside West, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley, TS1 3BA, UK. a.batterham@tees.ac.uk.
Heather BrownInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. heather.brown@ncl.ac.uk.
Miglena CampbellInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. mia.campbell@northumbria.ac.uk.
Stephan U DombrowskiSchool of Natural Sciences, Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. s.u.dombrowski@stir.ac.uk.
Alison GuestInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. alison.guest@newcastle.ac.uk.
Daniel JacksonOpen Lab, School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, 89 Sandyford Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8HW, UK. dan.jackson@ncl.ac.uk.
Dominika KwasnickaInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. dominika.kwasnicka@ncl.ac.uk.
Karim LadhaOpen Lab, School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, 89 Sandyford Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8HW, UK. karim.ladha@ncl.ac.uk.
Elaine McCollInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. elaine.mccoll@ncl.ac.uk.
Patrick OlivierOpen Lab, School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, 89 Sandyford Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8HW, UK. patrick.olivier@ncl.ac.uk.
Alexander J RothmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. rothm001@umn.edu.
Kirby SainsburyInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. kirby.sainsbury@ncl.ac.uk.
Alison J SteelNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, 1-4 Claremont Terrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE, UK. alison.steel@ncl.ac.uk.
Ian Nicholas SteenInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. nick.steen@ncl.ac.uk.
Luke ValeInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. luke.vale@ncl.ac.uk.
Martin WhiteCentre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), MRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. Martin.White@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk.
Peter WrightOpen Lab, School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, 89 Sandyford Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8HW, UK. p.c.wright@ncl.ac.uk.
Falko F SniehottaInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. falko.sniehotta@ncl.ac.uk.
Newcastle University · GBTeesside University · GBUnited Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilCancer Research UKChief Scientist OfficeDepartment of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-001Medical Research Council MR/J000477/1Medical Research Council MR/K023187/1Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective weight loss interventions are widely available but, after weight loss, most individuals regain weight. This article describes the protocol for the NULevel trial evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a systematically developed, inexpensive, scalable, technology-assisted, behavioural intervention for weight loss maintenance (WLM) in obese adults after initial weight loss. METHODS/

designA 12-month single-centre, two-armed parallel group, participant randomised controlled superiority trial is underway, recruiting a total of 288 previously obese adults after weight loss of ≥5 % within the previous 12 months. Participants are randomly assigned to intervention or control arms, with a 1:1 allocation, stratified by sex and percentage of body weight lost (<10 % vs ≥10 %). Change in weight (kg) from baseline to 12 months is the primary outcome. Weight, other anthropometric variables and 7-day physical activity (assessed via accelerometer) measures are taken at 0 and 12 months. Questionnaires at 0, 6 and 12 months assess psychological process variables, health service use and participant costs. Participants in the intervention arm initially attend an individual face-to-face WLM consultation with an intervention facilitator and then use a mobile internet platform to self-monitor and report their diet, daily activity (via pedometer) and weight through daily weighing on wirelessly connected scales. Automated feedback via mobile phone, tailored to participants' weight regain and goal progress is provided. Participants in the control arm receive quarterly newsletters (via links embedded in text messages) and wirelessly connected scales. Qualitative process evaluation interviews are conducted with a subsample of up to 40 randomly chosen participants. Acceptability and feasibility of procedures, cost-effectiveness, and relationships among socioeconomic variables and WLM will also be assessed. DISCUSSION: It is hypothesised that participants allocated to the intervention arm will show significantly lower levels of weight regain from baseline than those in the control arm. To date, this is the first WLM trial using remote real-time weight monitoring and mobile internet platforms to deliver a flexible, efficient and scalable intervention, tailored to the individual. This trial addresses a key research need and has the potential to make a vital contribution to the evidence base to inform future WLM policy and provision.

trial registrationhttp://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14657176 (registration date 20 March 2014).

Indexed as

Cell PhoneMobile ApplicationsWeight LossActigraphyAnthropometryBehavior TherapyClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisDietEnglandFeasibility StudiesFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID26395774
PMCPMC4580361
OpenAlexW1908744338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.