Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26395668›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2015

Tracking crop varieties using genotyping-by-sequencing markers: a case study using cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).

Ismail Y Rabbi, Peter A Kulakow, Joseph A Manu-Aduening, Ansong A Dankyi, James Y Asibuo, Elizabeth Y Parkes, Tahirou Abdoulaye, Gezahegn Girma, Melaku A Gedil, Punna Ramu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mapping the characterization landscape ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Genetic variation and synonymous cultivars in the USDA lychee (Genetic resources and crop evolution · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Paternity Assignment in White Guinea Yam (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ismail Y RabbiInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria. I.Rabbi@cgiar.org.
Peter A KulakowInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria. P.Kulakow@cgiar.org.
Joseph A Manu-AdueningCouncil for Scientific and Industrial Research-Crops Research Institute (CSIR-CRI), P.O. Box 3785, Kumasi, Ghana. jmaduening@yahoo.co.uk.
Ansong A DankyiAgriculture Innovation Consult, Kumasi, Ghana. dankyiaa@yahoo.com.
James Y AsibuoCouncil for Scientific and Industrial Research-Crops Research Institute (CSIR-CRI), P.O. Box 3785, Kumasi, Ghana. jyasibuo@gmail.com.
Elizabeth Y ParkesInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria. E.Parkes@cgiar.org.
Tahirou AbdoulayeInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria. T.Abdoulaye@cgiar.org.
Gezahegn GirmaInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria. G.Tessema@cgiar.org.
Melaku A GedilInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria. M.Gedil@cgiar.org.
Punna RamuCornell University, Institute for Genomic Diversity, 175, Biotechnology Building, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. rp444@cornell.edu.
Byron ReyesInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Planes de Altamira, de Pizza Hut Villa Fontana, 1c Oeste, Edificio CAR III, Oficina 4-1, Managua, Nicaragua. b.reyes@cgiar.org.
Mywish K MarediaMichigan State University, 446 W. Circle Drive, Room 89, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. maredia@msu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate identification of crop cultivars is crucial in assessing the impact of crop improvement research outputs. Two commonly used identification approaches, elicitation of variety names from farmer interviews and morphological plant descriptors, have inherent uncertainty levels. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) was used in a case study as an alternative method to track released varieties in farmers' fields, using cassava, a clonally propagated root crop widely grown in the tropics, and often disseminated through extension services and informal seed systems. A total of 917 accessions collected from 495 farming households across Ghana were genotyped at 56,489 SNP loci along with a "reference library" of 64 accessions of released varieties and popular landraces.

resultsAccurate cultivar identification and ancestry estimation was accomplished through two complementary clustering methods: (i) distance-based hierarchical clustering; and (ii) model-based maximum likelihood admixture analysis. Subsequently, 30% of the identified accessions from farmers' fields were matched to specific released varieties represented in the reference library. ADMIXTURE analysis revealed that the optimum number of major varieties was 11 and matched the hierarchical clustering results. The majority of the accessions (69%) belonged purely to one of the 11 groups, while the remaining accessions showed two or more ancestries. Further analysis using subsets of SNP markers reproduced results obtained from the full-set of markers, suggesting that GBS can be done at higher DNA multiplexing, thereby reducing the costs of variety fingerprinting. A large proportion of discrepancy between genetically unique cultivars as identified by markers and variety names as elicited from farmers were observed. Clustering results from ADMIXTURE analysis was validated using the assumption-free Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC) method.

conclusionWe show that genome-wide SNP markers from increasingly affordable GBS methods coupled with complementary cluster analysis is a powerful tool for fine-scale population structure analysis and variety identification. Moreover, the ancestry estimation provides a framework for quantifying the contribution of exotic germplasm or older improved varieties to the genetic background of contemporary improved cultivars.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisDNA, PlantGhanaHeterozygoteManihotPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID26395668
PMCPMC4580218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.