Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26395447›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2015

Development and comparative evaluation of two antigen detection tests for Visceral Leishmaniasis.

Aarthy C Vallur, Yeung L Tutterrow, Raodoh Mohamath, Sowmya Pattabhi, Asrat Hailu, Asim O Abdoun, Abdalla E Ahmed, Maowia Mukhtar, Md Abdus Salam, Meirielly Lima Almeida and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Leishmaniasis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of Loopamp™Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Recent advances and new strategies in Leishmaniasis diagnosis.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aarthy C VallurInfectious Disease Research Institute, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA. avallur@idri.org.
Yeung L TutterrowInfectious Disease Research Institute, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA. yltutterrow@gmail.com.
Raodoh MohamathInfectious Disease Research Institute, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA. Raodoh.Mohamath@idri.org.
Sowmya PattabhiInfectious Disease Research Institute, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA. sowmyapattabhi@gmail.com.
Asrat HailuDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. hailu_a2004@yahoo.com.
Asim O AbdounInstitute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan. aasemabdoon@hotmail.com.
Abdalla E AhmedInstitute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan. abdallah_elseer@yahoo.com.
Maowia MukhtarInstitute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan. mmukhtar@tropmedicine.org.
Md Abdus SalamDepartment of Microbiology, Rajshahi Medical College, Rajshahi, Bangladesh. drsalamrmc@yahoo.com.
Meirielly Lima AlmeidaDepartment of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil. meirifarma@hotmail.com.
Roque P AlmeidaDepartment of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil. roquepachecoalmeida@gmail.com.
Dinesh MondalInternational Center for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh. din63d@icddrb.org.
Audrey AlbertiniFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Geneva, Switzerland. audrey.albertini@finddx.org.
Hashim GhalibInfectious Disease Research Institute, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA. hashimghalib@gmail.com.
Malcolm S DuthieInfectious Disease Research Institute, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA. Malcolm.Duthie@idri.org.
Steven G ReedInfectious Disease Research Institute, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA. Steven.Reed@idri.org.
University of Khartoum · SD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisceral leishmaniasis (VL) can be fatal without timely diagnosis and treatment. Treatment efficacies vary due to drug resistance, drug toxicity and co-morbidities. It is important to monitor treatment responsiveness to confirm cure and curtail relapse. Currently, microscopy of spleen, bone marrow or lymph node biopsies is the only definitive method to evaluate cure. A less invasive test for treatment success is a high priority for VL management.

methodsIn this study, we describe the development of a capture ELISA based on detecting Leishmania donovani antigens in urine samples and comparison with the Leishmania Antigen ELISA, also developed for the same purpose. Both were developed as prototype kits and tested on patient urine samples from Sudan, Ethiopia, Bangladesh and Brazil, along with appropriate control samples from endemic and non-endemic regions. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed based on accurate detection of patients compared to control samples. One-Way ANOVA was used to assess the discrimination capacity of the tests and Cohen's kappa was used to assess their correlation.

resultsThe Leishmania Antigen Detect ELISA demonstrated >90% sensitivity on VL patient samples from Sudan, Bangladesh and Ethiopia and 88% on samples from Brazil. The Leishmania Antigen ELISA was comparable in performance except for lower sensitivity on Sudanese samples. Both were highly specific. To confirm utility in monitoring treatment, urine samples were collected from VL patients at days 0, 30 and 180 post-treatment. For the Leishmania Antigen Detect ELISA, positivity was high at day 0 at 95%, falling to 21% at day 30. At day 180, all samples were negative, corresponding well with clinical cure. A similar trend was also seen for the Leishmania Antigen ELISA albeit; with lower positivity of 91% at Day 0 and more patients, remaining positive at Days 30 and 180. DISCUSSION: The Leishmania Antigen Detect and the Leishmania Antigen ELISAs are standardized, user- friendly, quantitative and direct tests to detect Leishmania during acute VL as well as to monitor parasite clearance during treatment. They are a clear improvement over existing options.

conclusionThe ELISAs provide a non-invasive method to detect parasite antigens during acute infection and monitor its clearance upon cure, filling an unmet need in VL management. Further refinement of the tests with more samples from endemic regions will define their utility in monitoring treatment.

Indexed as

Antigens, ProtozoanBangladeshBrazilEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEthiopiaHumansLeishmania donovaniLeishmaniasis, VisceralSensitivity and SpecificitySudanAntigens, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID26395447
PMCPMC4580298
OpenAlexW1913812011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.