Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26395341›Full record

ReviewNutrition reviews2015

Pregnancy diet and associated outcomes in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.

Pauline M Emmett, Louise R Jones, Jean Golding

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pauline M EmmettP.M. Emmett and J. Golding are with the Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. L.R. Jones is with the School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. p.m.emmett@bristol.ac.uk.
Louise R JonesP.M. Emmett and J. Golding are with the Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. L.R. Jones is with the School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jean GoldingP.M. Emmett and J. Golding are with the Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. L.R. Jones is with the School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council 74882Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Wellcome Trust 092731Wellcome Trust 102215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All publications covering diet during pregnancy that stemmed from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children were reviewed. Diet was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. Socioeconomic background, maternal mental health, and the health and development of the offspring were assessed using a variety of methods, such as direct measurement, self-completion questionnaires, and assays of biological samples. Differences in diet, including specific food and nutrient intakes and dietary patterns, were associated with maternal educational attainment, smoking habits, and financial difficulty. There were marginal intakes, compared with recommendations, of the key nutrients iron, magnesium, potassium, and folate. Maternal diet during pregnancy was predictive of offspring diet during childhood. There were independent associations between prenatal fish consumption and lower frequency of maternal depressive and anxiety symptoms, as well as lower frequency of intrauterine growth retardation. Consistent evidence that fish consumption during pregnancy benefited the neurocognitive development of the child was also found. Two constituents of fish, n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and iodine, were associated with these benefits in children. The findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children strengthen the recommendation to eat fish regularly during pregnancy.

Indexed as

DietMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdultAnimalsChildChild DevelopmentChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaDiet RecordsDiet SurveysEnglandFatty Acids, Omega-3FemaleFetal Growth RetardationFishesHumansLongitudinal StudiesFatty Acids, Omega-3MicronutrientsALSPACchildhood dietdiet during pregnancyFFQfishfolateiodineironmagnesiummercuryn-3 polyunsaturated fatty acidsneurocognitive developmentpotassium

Identifiers

PMID26395341
PMCPMC4586451
OpenAlexW2338546211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.