Response to Shihadeh et al. (2015): E-cigarettes generate high levels of aldehydes only in 'dry puff' conditions.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Daily exposure to formaldehyde and acetaldehyde and potential health risk associated with use of high and low nicotine e-liquid concentrations.Scientific reports · 2020
   Trial
2. Comparative toxicological assessment of cigarettes and new category products via anToxicology reports · 2024
   Article
3. Automated dripping devices for vapers: RDTAs, bottomfeeders, squonk mods and dripboxes.Tobacco control · 2018
   Article
4. Assessing electronic cigarette emissions: linking physico-chemical properties to product brand, e-liquid flavoring additives, operational voltage and user puffing patterns.Inhalation toxicology · 2018
   Article
5. Drug vaping applied to cannabis: Is "Cannavaping" a therapeutic alternative to marijuana?Scientific reports · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  E-cigarettes generate high levels of aldehydes only in 'dry puff' conditions.2015
• Comment on
  Commentary on Farsalinos et al. (2015): E-cigarettes generate high levels of aldehydes only in 'dry puff' conditions.2015

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as