Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26395264›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2015

[Voluntary and mandatory quality assurance in mental health care: European examples].

A Bramesfeld, G Willms, J Szecsenyi

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A BramesfeldAQUA-Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH, Maschmühlenweg 8-10, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland. anke.bramesfeld@aqua-institut.de.
G WillmsAQUA-Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH, Maschmühlenweg 8-10, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland.
J SzecsenyiAQUA-Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH, Maschmühlenweg 8-10, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the turn of the century, quality assurance (QA) programs are increasingly being implemented; both generally in health systems and specifically for mental health services. These QA programs can be implemented on a mandatory basis as well as voluntarily. Benefits of mandatory QA programs are a reliable, country-wide dataflow, as well as their long-term sustainability and comparability. Shortcomings relate to the limitations imposed by legal requirements. Benefits of voluntary QA programs are their freedom and flexibility in terms of methods and data sources. Shortcomings relate to the impossibility of country-wide implementation and a lack of sustainability, as well as to the data quality. Examples for QA in mental health care from different European countries show that mandatory and voluntary QA initiatives could complement each other. Specialist medical societies play an important role in the development of voluntary QA and the promotion of high quality care. An example is the accreditation to mental health services offered by the Royal College of Psychiatrists in the United Kingdom.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicDelivery of Health CareEuropeHumansMental DisordersMental Health ServicesQuality Assurance, Health CareAccreditationEuropeMandatory quality assuranceMental health careQuality of care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.