ArticleEndocrine2016
Follow-up ultrasound may be enough for thyroid nodules from 5 mm to 1 cm in size.
Article in Endocrine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The association of uric acid with the development of thyroid nodules: a retrospective cohort study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2022Review
- Evaluation of surgical risk and prognosis between thyroid nodules of size <1 and ≥1 cm.Gland surgery · 2019Article
- Article
- A meta-analysis-derived proposal for a clinical, ultrasonographic, and cytological scoring system to evaluate thyroid nodules: the "CUT" score.Endocrine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated whether follow-up ultrasound (US) is enough for thyroid nodules 5-10 mm, and whether 3 years of interval between the initial US and next US is appropriate. This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and the need to obtain informed consent was waived. The study included 447 thyroid nodules 5-10 mm from 378 patients who underwent initial thyroid US, and underwent 3 years or more of follow-up US. The presence and characteristics of malignancy detected on follow-up were reviewed. Maximal diameters of each nodule at the initial and last US were measured. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to assess association with nodule growth 3 mm or larger. Seven malignancies (1.6 %, 7 of 447) were detected on a mean 70.6 ± 20.3 months (range 36-104 months). Only one had growth 3 mm or larger, and all malignancies did not have extensive extrathyroidal extension, lateral lymph nodes, or distant metastasis. 6.0 % (27 of 447) of nodules had growth 3 mm or larger. Nodules in older patients were less likely to grow, and benign-looking nodules were more likely to grow. Longer follow-up time 6 years or more was not associated with growth, and no cancers were detected during the long follow-up time. Immediate US-FNA for thyroid nodules 5-10 mm are discouraged, unless suspicious metastatic lymph nodes are present. Also, a follow-up US 3 years after the initial US may be enough for these nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26394881What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.