Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26394880›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2016

Role of Staging in Patients with Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumours.

Ashley Kieran Clift, Omar Faiz, Adil Al-Nahhas, Andreas Bockisch, Marc Olaf Liedke, Erik Schloericke, Harpreet Wasan, John Martin, Paul Ziprin, Krishna Moorthy and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashley Kieran CliftDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
Omar FaizDepartment of Surgery, St. Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Adil Al-NahhasDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Andreas BockischDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Marc Olaf LiedkeDepartment of Surgery, Westkuesten Klinikum Heide, Heide, Germany.
Erik SchloerickeDepartment of Surgery, Westkuesten Klinikum Heide, Heide, Germany.
Harpreet WasanDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
John MartinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paul ZiprinDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
Krishna MoorthyDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
Andrea FrillingDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK. a.frilling@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBEssen University Hospital · DESt Mark's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumours are the commonest malignancy arising in the small intestine and have substantially increased in incidence in recent decades. Patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumours commonly develop lymph node and/or distant metastases. Here, we examine the role of staging in 84 surgically treated patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumours, comparing diagnostic information yielded from morphological, functional and endoscopic modalities. Furthermore, we correlate pre-operative staging with intra-operative findings in a sub-cohort of 20 patients. The vast majority of patients had been histologically confirmed to have low-grade (Ki-67 <2%) disease; however, lymph node and distant metastases were observed in 74 (88.1%) and 51 (60.7%) of patients at presentation, respectively. Liver metastases were evident in 48 (57.1%) patients, with solely peritoneal and bone metastases observed in 2 (2.4%) and 1 (1.2%) patients, respectively. Forty patients (47.6%) received multimodal treatment. In our sub-cohort analysis, pre-operative imaging understaged disease in 14/20 (70%) when compared with intra-operative findings. In patients with multifocal primary tumours and miliary liver metastases, no imaging modality was able to detect entire disease spread. Overall, presently available imaging modalities heavily underestimate disease stage, with meticulous intra-operative abdominal examination being superior to any imaging technology. Multimodal treatment has an important role in prolonging survival.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyEndoscopyFemaleHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsIntestine, SmallLiver NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNeuroendocrine tumoursSmall bowelStagingSurgery

Identifiers

PMID26394880
OpenAlexW2159160655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.