Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26394640›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2016

Cognitive and Psychomotor Entrustable Professional Activities: Can Simulators Help Assess Competency in Trainees?

Tim Dwyer, Veronica Wadey, Douglas Archibald, William Kraemer, Jesse Slade Shantz, John Townley, Darrell Ogilvie-Harris, Massimo Petrera, Peter Ferguson, Markku Nousiainen

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of a certification examination for orthopedic sports medicine fellowsCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2020
    Article
  7. Technical Obstacles in Total Knee Arthroplasty Learning: A Steps Breakdown Evaluation.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tim DwyerWomen's College and Mt Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, M5S 1B1, ON, Canada. tim.dwyer@wchospital.ca.
Veronica WadeySunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Douglas ArchibaldUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
William KraemerToronto East General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jesse Slade ShantzUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
John TownleyUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Darrell Ogilvie-HarrisWomen's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Massimo PetreraUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter FergusonMt Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Markku NousiainenSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn entrustable professional activity describes a professional task that postgraduate residents must master during their training. The use of simulation to assess performance of entrustable professional activities requires further investigation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is simulation-based assessment of resident performance of entrustable professional activities reliable? (2) Is there evidence of important differences between Postgraduate Year (PGY)-1 and PGY-4 residents when performing simulated entrustable professional activities?

methodsThree entrustable professional activities were chosen from a list of competencies: management of the patient for total knee arthroplasty (TKA); management of the patient with an intertrochanteric hip fracture; and management of the patient with an ankle fracture. Each assessment of entrustable professional activity was 40 minutes long with three components: preoperative management of a patient (history-taking, examination, image interpretation); performance of a technical procedure on a sawbones model; and postoperative management of a patient (postoperative orders, management of complications). Residents were assessed by six faculty members who used checklists based on a modified Delphi technique, an overall global rating scale as well as a previously validated global rating scale for the technical procedure component of each activity. Nine PGY-1 and nine PGY-4 residents participated in our simulated assessment. We assessed reliability by calculating the internal consistency of the mean global rating for each activity as well as the interrater reliability between the faculty assessment and blinded review of videotaped encounters. We sought evidence of a difference in performance between PGY-1 and PGY-4 residents on the overall global rating scale for each station of each entrustable professional activity.

resultsThe reliability (Cronbach's α) for the hip fracture activity was 0.88, it was 0.89 for the ankle fracture activity, and it was 0.84 for the TKA activity. A strong correlation was seen between blinded observer video review and faculty scores (mean 0.87 [0.07], p < 0.001). For the hip fracture entrustable professional activity, the PGY-4 group had a higher mean global rating scale than the PGY-1 group for preoperative management (3.56 [0.5] versus 2.33 [0.5], p < 0.001), postoperative management (3.67 [0.5] versus 2.22 [0.7], p < 0.001), and technical procedures (3.11 [0.3] versus 3.67 [0.5], p = 0.015). For the TKA activity, the PGY-4 group scored higher for postoperative management (3.5 [0.8] versus 2.67 [0.5], p = 0.016) and technical procedures (3.22 [0.9] versus 2.22 [0.9], p = 0.04) than the PGY-1 group, but no difference for preoperative management with the numbers available (PGY-4, 3.44 [0.7] versus PGY-1 2.89 [0.8], p = 0.14). For the ankle fracture activity, the PGY-4 group scored higher for postoperative management (3.22 [0.8] versus 2.33 [0.7], p = 0.18) and technical procedures (3.22 [1.2] versus 2.0 [0.7], p = 0.018) than the PGY-1 groups, but no difference for preoperative management with the numbers available (PGY-4, 3.22 [0.8] versus PGY-1, 2.78 [0.7], p = 0.23).

conclusionsThe results of our study show that simulated assessment of entrustable professional activities may be used to determine the ability of a resident to perform professional tasks that are critical components of medical training. In this manner, educators can ensure that competent performance of these skills in the simulated setting occurs before actual practice with patients in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

CognitionComputer SimulationModels, AnatomicPsychomotor PerformanceAnkle FracturesArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeChecklistClinical CompetenceComputer-Assisted InstructionCurriculumEducational StatusEducation, Medical, GraduateFracture FixationHip FracturesHumansOrthopedic Procedures

Identifiers

PMID26394640
PMCPMC4773339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.