Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26394331›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Deschampsia antarctica Desv. (Poaceae), Maritime Antarctic.

Alexandra V Amosova, Nadezhda L Bolsheva, Tatiana E Samatadze, Maryana O Twardovska, Svyatoslav A Zoshchuk, Igor O Andreev, Ekaterina D Badaeva, Viktor A Kunakh, Olga V Muravenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Species of the SectionsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. InterstitialPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Cytogenomics ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Retrotransposon-based genetic diversity ofEcology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Fluorescence in situ hybridization in plants: recent developments and future applications.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexandra V AmosovaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Nadezhda L BolshevaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana E SamatadzeEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Maryana O TwardovskaInstitute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Svyatoslav A ZoshchukEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Igor O AndreevInstitute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Ekaterina D BadaevaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Viktor A KunakhInstitute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Olga V MuravenkoEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deschampsia antarctica Desv. (Poaceae) (2n = 26) is one of the two vascular plants adapted to the harshest environment of the Antarctic. Although the species is a valuable model for study of environmental stress tolerance in plants, its karyotype is still poorly investigated. We firstly conducted a comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of D. antarctica collected on four islands of the Maritime Antarctic. D. antarctica karyotypes were studied by Giemsa C- and DAPI/C-banding, Ag-NOR staining, multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization with repeated DNA probes (pTa71, pTa794, telomere repeats, pSc119.2, pAs1) and the GAA simple sequence repeat probe. We also performed sequential rapid in situ hybridization with genomic DNA of D. caespitosa. Two chromosome pairs bearing transcriptionally active 45S rDNA loci and five pairs with 5S rDNA sites were detected. A weak intercalary site of telomere repeats was revealed on the largest chromosome in addition to telomere hybridization signals at terminal positions. This fact confirms indirectly the hypothesis that chromosome fusion might have been the cause of the unusual for cereals chromosome number in this species. Based on patterns of distribution of the examined molecular cytogenetic markers, all chromosomes in karyotypes were identified, and chromosome idiograms of D. antarctica were constructed. B chromosomes were found in most karyotypes of plants from Darboux Island. A mixoploid plant with mainly triploid cells bearing a Robertsonian rearrangement was detected among typical diploid specimens from Great Jalour Island. The karyotype variability found in D. antarctica is probably an expression of genome instability induced by environmental stress factors. The differences in C-banding patterns and in chromosome distribution of rDNA loci as well as homologous highly repeated DNA sequences detected between genomes of D. antarctica and its related species D. caespitosa indicate that genome reorganization involving coding and noncoding repeated DNA sequences had occurred during the divergence of these species.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsAntarctic RegionsChromosome BandingChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantCytogenetic AnalysisDiploidyGeographyIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceIslandsKaryotypingPoaceaeRNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 5STriploidyRNA, RibosomalRNA, ribosomal, 45SRNA, Ribosomal, 5S

Identifiers

PMID26394331
PMCPMC4578767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.