ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine
Accelerated genome engineering through multiplexing.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking the PAM compatibility of Cas12a variants for high-throughput yeast genetic variant engineering.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Development of artificial transcription factors and their applications in cell reprograming, genetic screen, and disease treatment.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Review
- Management of microbial enzymes for biofuels and biogas production by using metagenomic and genome editing approaches.3 Biotech · 2021Review
- Recombineering and MAGE.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021Article
- Plant breeding at the speed of light: the power of CRISPR/Cas to generate directed genetic diversity at multiple sites.BMC plant biology · 2019Review
- Combinatorial metabolic engineering using an orthogonal tri-functional CRISPR system.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Potential Biotechnological Strategies for the Cleanup of Heavy Metals and Metalloids.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Throughout the biological sciences, the past 15 years have seen a push toward the analysis and engineering of biological systems at the organism level. Given the complexity of even the simplest organisms, though, to elicit a phenotype of interest often requires genotypic manipulation of several loci. By traditional means, sequential editing of genomic targets requires a significant investment of time and labor, as the desired editing event typically occurs at a very low frequency against an overwhelming unedited background. In recent years, the development of a suite of new techniques has greatly increased editing efficiency, opening up the possibility for multiple editing events to occur in parallel. Termed as multiplexed genome engineering, this approach to genome editing has greatly expanded the scope of possible genome manipulations in diverse hosts, ranging from bacteria to human cells. The enabling technologies for multiplexed genome engineering include oligonucleotide-based and nuclease-based methodologies, and their application has led to the great breadth of successful examples described in this review. While many technical challenges remain, there also exists a multiplicity of opportunities in this rapidly expanding field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.