Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26394283›Full record

ArticleVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2015

Environmental Monitoring and Surveillance of Rodents and Vectors for Francisella tularensis Following Outbreaks of Human Tularemia in Georgia.

Eka Elashvili, Ian Kracalik, Irma Burjanadze, Sophio Datukishvili, Gvantsa Chanturia, Nikoloz Tsertsvadze, Levan Beridze, Merab Shavishvili, Archil Dzneladze, Marina Grdzelidze and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Development of Immunoassays for Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  2. Review
  3. PCR Based Prevalence Study ofJournal of veterinary research · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Phylogenetic Lineages ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Eka Elashvili1 National Food Agency , Tbilisi, Georgia .
Ian Kracalik2 Spatial Epidemiology and Ecology Research Lab, Department of Geography, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.
Irma Burjanadze4 National Center for Disease Control and Public Health , Tbilisi, Georgia .
Sophio Datukishvili4 National Center for Disease Control and Public Health , Tbilisi, Georgia .
Gvantsa Chanturia4 National Center for Disease Control and Public Health , Tbilisi, Georgia .
Nikoloz Tsertsvadze4 National Center for Disease Control and Public Health , Tbilisi, Georgia .
Levan Beridze4 National Center for Disease Control and Public Health , Tbilisi, Georgia .
Merab Shavishvili4 National Center for Disease Control and Public Health , Tbilisi, Georgia .
Archil Dzneladze4 National Center for Disease Control and Public Health , Tbilisi, Georgia .
Marina Grdzelidze4 National Center for Disease Control and Public Health , Tbilisi, Georgia .
Paata Imnadze4 National Center for Disease Control and Public Health , Tbilisi, Georgia .
Andrew Pearson5 University of Maryland , Maryland.
Jason K Blackburn2 Spatial Epidemiology and Ecology Research Lab, Department of Geography, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.
National Center for Disease Control and Public Health · GEUniversity of Florida · USNational Food Administration · SEUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tularemia is a re-emerging bacterial zoonosis, broadly distributed across the northern hemisphere. In Georgia, there is a history of human tularemia outbreaks dating back to the 1940s. In response to outbreaks, health officials initiated long-term field surveillance and environmental monitoring. The objective of our study was to obtain information from 57 years of field surveys to identify species that play a role in the occurrence Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica in the environment in Georgia. We collected historical data on human outbreaks, field collections, population dynamics of the common vole (Microtus arvalis), and conducted surveys on small mammals and vectors from five regions in Georgia during 1956-2012. Bacterial isolation was conducted using standard culturing techniques, and isolation rates for species were obtained for a subset of years. We used a Spearman rank correlation to test for associations between the density of the common vole and isolation rates. From 1956 through 2012, there were four recorded outbreaks of human tularemia (362 cases). A total of 465 bacterial isolates of F. tularensis subsp. holarctica were obtained from 27 species and environmental samples. The number of isolations was highest in the common vole (M. arvalis; 149 isolates; 32%) and Dermacentor marginatus ticks (132 isolates; 28%); isolation rates ranged between 0-0.91% and 0-0.47%, respectively. Population dynamics of the common vole were not correlated with the isolation rate. Given the history of tularemia re-emergence in Georgia, continued field surveys and environmental monitoring may provide an early indication of outbreak risk in humans. In conclusion, our findings provide evidence of long-standing foci of F. tularensis subsp. holarctica that are likely maintained by the common vole-tick cycle.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksAnimalsArvicolinaeDermacentorDisease ReservoirsEnvironmental MonitoringFrancisella tularensisGeorgiaHumansRodentiaTularemiaZoonosesDermacentor marginatusFrancisella tularensisGeorgiaHuman tularemiaMicrotus arvalisVole–tick cycle

Identifiers

PMID26394283
PMCPMC4593993
OpenAlexW2412579160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.