Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26393958›Full record

ArticlePhysiological measurement2015

Measurement of brachial artery endothelial function using a standard blood pressure cuff.

Jonathan S Maltz, Geoffrey H Tison, Hugh F Alley, Thomas F Budinger, Christopher D Owens, Jeffrey Olgin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological measurement, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan S MaltzDepartment of Structural Biology and Imaging, Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Geoffrey H Tison
Hugh F Alley
Thomas F Budinger
Christopher D Owens
Jeffrey Olgin
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BASIS OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASET32HL007731 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Brian L Black · 1992 to 2026
$12.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integrity of endothelial function in major arteries (EFMA) is a powerful independent predictor of heart attack and stroke. Existing ultrasound-based non-invasive assessment methods are technically challenging and suitable only for laboratory settings. EFMA, like blood pressure (BP), is both acutely and chronically affected by factors such as lifestyle and medication. Consequently, laboratory-based measurements cannot fully gauge the effects of medical interventions on EFMA. EFMA and BP have, arguably, comparable (but complementary) value in the assessment of cardiovascular health. Widespread deployment of EFMA assessment is thus a desirable clinical goal. To this end, we propose a device based on modifying the measurement protocol of a standard electronic sphygmomanometer. The protocol involves inflating the cuff to sub-diastolic levels to enable recording of the pulse waveform before and after vasodilatory stimulus. The mechanical unloading of the arterial wall provided by the cuff amplifies the distension that occurs with each pulse, which is measured as a pressure variation in the cuff. We show that the height of the rising edge of each pulse is proportional to the change in lumen area between diastole and systole. This allows the effect of vasodilatory stimuli on the artery to be measured with high sensitivity. We compare the proposed cuff flow-mediated dilation (cFMD) method to ultrasound flow-mediated dilation (uFMD). We find significant correlation (r = 0.55, p = 0.003, N = 27) between cFMD- and uFMD-based metrics obtained when the release of a 5 min cuff occlusion is employed to induce endothelial stimulus via reactive hyperemia. cFMD is approximately proportional to the square of uFMD, representing a typical increase in sensitivity to vasodilation of 300-600%. This study illustrates the potential for an individual to conveniently measure his/her EFMA by using a low-cost reprogrammed home sphygmomanometer.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure DeterminationAdultBrachial ArteryEndothelium, VascularFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference StandardsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedTime FactorsUltrasonic WavesVasodilation

Identifiers

PMID26393958
PMCPMC4933653
OpenAlexW2406313489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.